摘要
目的探讨两种不同方法治疗不稳定型粗隆间骨折的早期疗效。方法回顾性分析我院近年来收治的采取两种方法治疗的185例骨折患者的临床资料。结果 Gamma钉组的功能恢复优良率达到86.59%,与DHS组的69.51%比较,差异有统计学意义。结论 Gamma钉与DHS相比具有明显的优越性,是较好的治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的方法,值得临床推广使用。
Objective To explore the two different approaches to the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the early effects. Methods A retrospective analysis were admitted to our hospital in re-cent years,these two methods of treatment of patients with fractures of 185 patients with clinical data. Results Gamma nail group function recovery rate of 86. 59% good,and the DHS group 69. 51% compared with a significant difference. Conclusion Gamma nail and DHS has obvious advantages in comparison,is a better treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the method,is worthy of clinical use.
出处
《中国实用医药》
2010年第23期40-41,共2页
China Practical Medicine
