摘要
"一事不再理"是判断当事人是否具有"诉之利益"的标准之一。在这个过程中,涉及到程序法和实体法的交错问题。在多个请求权存在的情形中,此判断尤为艰难。当产生请求权竞合的时候,我们主张应该赋予法院一定的职责,以避免不同主张产生的问题。
The principal of forbidding repeated action is one of criterions for judging whether the parties have the internet of litigation,which involves the tangle between substantive law and procedural law.The judgment is more difficult when several claims exist.We hold that,when the concurrence of claims occurs,the court should be given some power to avoid problems of different opinions.
出处
《晋中学院学报》
2010年第4期73-75,共3页
Journal of Jinzhong University
关键词
诉之利益
请求权竞合
一事不再理
internet of litigation
concurrence of claims
forbidding repeated action
