摘要
目的：通过比较分析宫颈癌临床分期与手术-病理分期，探讨术前临床分期常见的问题和补充改进方法。方法：收集我院手术治疗的166例临床ⅠA～ⅡB期宫颈癌患者的临床病理资料，将临床分期（FIGO分期）与手术-病理分期进行比较。结果：IA、IB、ⅡA、ⅡB各临床分期与手术一病理分期的符合率分别为86．11％、78．38％、52．17％、40．00％；临床分期总的符合率为70．48％。结论：随着宫颈癌临床期别的升高，分期的准确性呈下降趋势。
Objective：The study was conducted to compare clinic staging of cervical cancer with operative- pathological staging （pTNM classification） ,in order to research the existed problems about clinic staging in pre-operation and how to supplement and improve them. Methods：166 patients with stage I A - II B cervical cancer who had surgical treatment were recruited , their clinical stages and the surgical pathological stages were compared. Results：The coincident rate of FIGO clinical stages of IA, IB, IIA, lib with surgical patholog- ical pTNM stages were 86.11%, 78.38%, 52.17%, 40.00% respectively. The overall accuracy rate of the clinical staging was 70.48%. Conclusions：The accuracy decreases markedly with the increase of the clinical stages.
出处
《实用妇产科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第7期528-530,共3页
Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词
宫颈癌
临床分期
手术-病理分期
Cervical cancer
Clinic staging
Operative-pathological staging
