期刊文献+

Comparison between several seismic inversion methods and their application in mountainous coal fields of western China 被引量:9

Comparison between several seismic inversion methods and their application in mountainous coal fields of western China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 With the objective of establishing the necessary conditions for 3D seismic data from mountainous areas in western China, we compared the application results of wave impedance technology in the lithology and exploration of coal fields. First, we introduce principles and features of three kinds of inversion methods. i.e., Model-Based Inversion, Constrained Sparse Spike Inversion (CSSI) and Geology-Seismic Feature Inversion. Secondly, these inversion methods are contrasted in their application to 3D seismic data from some coalfields in western China. The main information provided by the research includes: improving the vertical resolution of coal deposit strata, inferring lateral variation of the lithology and predicting coal seams and their roof lithology. Finally, the comparison between the three methods shows that the model-based inversion has the higher resolution, while CSSI inversion has better waveform continuity. The geology-seismic feature inversion requires information from a large number of wells and many types of logging curves of good quality. All three methods can meet the requirements of seismic exploration for lithological exploration in coal fields. With the objective of establishing the necessary conditions for 3D seismic data from mountainous areas in western China, we compared the application results of wave impedance technology in the lithology and exploration of coal fields. First, we intro- duce principles and features of three kinds of inversion methods, i.e., Model-Based Inversion, Constrained Sparse Spike Inversion (CSSI) and Geology-Seismic Feature Inversion. Secondly, these inversion methods are contrasted in their application to 3D seismic data from some coalfields in western China. The main information provided by the research includes: improving the vertical resolu- tion of coal deposit strata, inferring lateral variation of the lithology and predicting coal seams and their roof lithology. Finally, the comparison between the three methods shows that the model-based inversion has the higher resolution, while CSSI inversion has better waveform continuity. The geology-seismic feature inversion requires information from a large number of wells and many types of logging curves of good quality. All three methods can meet the requirements of seismic exploration for lithological explo- ration in coal fields.
出处 《Mining Science and Technology》 EI CAS 2010年第4期585-590,共6页 矿业科学技术(英文版)
基金 part of an ongoing project of the National Important Industry Technological Development Project (High Precision 3D Seismic Technology of Coal Resources of Western China) the financial support from the National Basic Research Program of China (No.2009CB 219603) the National Key Scientific and Technological Project of China (No.2008ZX05035-005-003HZ)
关键词 model-based inversion constrained sparse spike inversion geology-seismic feature inversion coal seam lithological exploration 地震反演 中国西部 西部山区 应用 煤炭 三维地震资料 约束稀疏脉冲反演 垂直分辨率
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献33

共引文献111

同被引文献59

引证文献9

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部