摘要
国内对萧斯塔科维奇人生及音乐的研究往往过多依赖伏尔科夫极具争议性的《见证》。此文通过追溯海外萧斯塔科维奇研究的历史以及近况,特别是对西方已持续多年的"萧斯塔科维奇之战"的综述,来呼吁学者走出《见证》的"魔界",拓宽萧研究的新视角。笔者认为,对《见证》的过分的依赖,不仅导致了对萧斯塔科维奇人生理解的片面性,也导致了对其音乐解读的贫瘠有限性。
Thanks to Volkov＇s Testimony, much of the Chinese scholarship on Shostakovich to date has focused on his sufferings under Stalin and on the impact of ideological control on his composition. By reducing the complexity of music, power and politics to a single strand of tyrannical repression and covert resistance, this one dimensional focus has not only resulted in a poor understanding of the richness of Shostakovich＇ s mu＇- sic but also led to an oversimplification of the operations of power- social, economic, and political-and artistic agency. Through a survey of Western studies of the former Soviet composer with a particular focus on the so- called ＂Shostakovich War＂, this essay attempts to restore the complexity of art and ideology under authoritari- an rule and argues for a more nuanced understanding of the dialectic relations between artistic creativity and political control.
出处
《黄钟（武汉音乐学院学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期118-132,共15页
Huangzhong:Journal of Wuhan Conservatory of Music
关键词
萧斯塔科维奇
斯大林
《见证》
“萧斯塔科维奇之战”
Dmitri Shostakovich （1906-1975）, Joseph Stalin （1878-1953）, Testimony the Shostakovich War
