摘要
目的探讨并对比两种检查方法，以进一步降低室间隔缺损的漏诊率。方法对已确诊为有先天性心脏病的孕妇136例（与其协商并确保随访或流产后对胎儿进行尸检）分别利用二维超声检测的四腔心切面和基本六切面法进行检查。结果方法一即心尖四腔心切面检出室间隔缺损为22例，占检出率的70．98％，方法二即基本六切面法检出室间隔缺损为25例，占检出率的80.65％。结论基本六切面较心尖四腔心切面对室间隔缺损检出更敏感。
Objective We study and compare with the two methods（the six-view method and apical four-chamber view method） so as to reduce the omission diagnostic rate on ventricular septal defect furtherly. Methods There are 136 pregnant women who have been made a definite diagnosis that their foetus have congenital heart disease .The six-view method and apical four-chamber view method of cardiography were used separately to inspect ventricular septal defect . Results Twenty-two cases of ventricular septal defect were diagnosed by aprical four-chamber view method and its sensitivity is 70.98%; twenty-five cases of ventricular septal defect were diagnosed by the six-view method and its sensitivity is 80. 65%. Conclusions The six-view method was more effective than aprical our-chamber view method in screening for ventricular seutal defect.
出处
《中国保健营养（下半月）》
2010年第8期223-224,共2页
China Health Care & Nutrition
关键词
先天性心脏病
室间隔缺损
胎儿心脏
超声心动图
Congenital heart disease ,Ventricular septal defect,Fatal heart,Echocardiography
