摘要
目的 采用大鼠肝脏隔离灌注模型探讨逆行隔离灌注（RIHP）较顺行隔离灌注（IHP）能否减少正常肝组织损伤及化疗药物外周泄漏率.方法 将90只体重300～350 g雄性SD大鼠随机分为A、B、C三组,每组30只：A组为空白对照组,经肝动脉及门静脉灌注乳酸林格液,以下腔静脉为灌注液流出道;B组行IHP,经肝动脉灌注含有350 mg/kg的氟尿嘧啶（5-Fu）,门静脉灌注乳酸林格液,以下腔静脉为灌注液流出道;C组行RIHP,经肝动脉灌注含有350 mg/kg的氟尿嘧啶（5-Fu）,经下腔静脉灌注乳酸林格液,以门静脉为灌注液流出道.术后1、3、5、7 d分别行血清ALT测定及肝组织病理学检查;高效液相色谱分析仪检测B、C组术中外周血药浓度.结果 三组术后3 d存活率分别为90.0%、86.7%和90.0%,三者差异无统计学意义.三组血清ALT均在术后第一天达到峰值,A组为（481.6±207.6）μmol/L;B组为（1641.6±658.0）μmol/L;C组为（913.0±353.5）μmol/L.B、C组均显著高于A组（P＜0.05）;B组显著高于C组（P＜0.05）.B组与C组术中外周血药浓度峰值分别为（131.2±29.4）μg/ml和（65.3±28.4）μg/ml.两组外周浓度有显著性差异（P＜0.05）.A组术后肝脏病理改变较轻,术后7 d基本恢复正常;B组术后肝脏病理学改变相对严重,术后7 d局部仍可见坏死灶;C组术后肝脏病理改变后较A组严重,但较B组轻,术后7 d基本恢复正常.结论 RIHP较之IHP能够显著减轻化疗药物对正常肝组织的毒副作用和药物的外周泄漏,有望成为一种对肝癌更加有效安全的区域化疗方法.
Objective The retrograde isolated hepatic perfusion （RIHP） model was used to compare with the isolated hepatic perfusion （IHP） model in reducing the rate of normal hepatic tissue toxicity and peripheral drug leakage during chemotherapy in rat liver. Methods A total of 90 male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 300-350 g were randomized into 3 groups with 30 rats in each. Group A： perfusion with Lactated Ringer＇S Solution through arteria hepatica （RA） and portal vein （PV）,the inferior vena cava was used as an outflow tract of perfusate. Group B： For isolated hepatic perfusion （IHP）, Fluorouracil （5-FU） was added into the perfusate at a dose of 350mg/kg and introduced in to the liver through arteria hepatica, portal vein was perfused by Lactated Ringer＇S Solution, and the inferior vena cava was used as an outflow tract of perfusate. Group C： by using retrograde isolated hepatic perfusion （RIHP）, the solution which contains 350 mg/kg Fluorouracil （5-FU） was also introduced through arteria hepatica, the inferior vena cava was introduced with Lactated Ringer＇S Solution;the portal vein was used as an outflow tract of the perfusate. On day 1, 3, 5 and 7 after the perfusion in all groups, blood serum ALT test and liver histopathology test were performed. The peripheral blood drug levels were measured with high performance liquid chromatographic（HPLC） system in group B and group C. Results The survival rate was 90%, 86.7% and 90% in group A, B and C,respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in the survival rate among the 3groups. In all the three groups, serum ALT levels were the highest on the first day after IHP： （481.6±207.6）μmol/LingroupA;（1641. 6±658.0） μmol/LingroupBand（ 913. 0±353. 5）μmol/Lin group C. Significant higher serum ALT levels were observed by comparing group B and C with A（P＜0. 05）. Meanwhile, the serum ALT levels were significantly higher in group B than in group C （P＜0.05）. The peaks of peripheral blood d
出处
《中华肝胆外科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第6期451-454,共4页
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
基金
本课题受国家自然科学基金资助（基金编号：30872972）
