期刊文献+

桩基础施工过程对环境影响的研究 被引量:3

Study of the environmental impact of pile foundation construction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为实现桩基础施工阶段环境影响的客观评价,优选施工工艺,基于施工阶段环境表现分析系统(Construction Environmental PerformanceAnalysis System,CEPAS)定量评价了施工中常见的人工挖孔灌注桩和长螺旋钻孔管内泵压CFG桩的环境影响,同时分析了环境影响指标和施工工艺。结果表明,1 m^3人工挖孔灌注桩的社会支付意愿值(178.94元)大于长螺旋钻孔管内泵压CFG桩(25.43元),因此,为提高桩基础的绿色施工水平,可以优先采用长螺旋钻孔管内泵压CFG桩。对人工挖孔灌注桩各工序的环境影响分析表明,钢筋加工和混凝土生产工序占总社会支付意愿值的比例最大(99.50%);对长螺旋钻孔管内泵压CFG桩,混合料制备占总社会支付意愿值的比例(89.46%)大于其他工序。因此,改进这些主要环境影响工艺能更有效地降低这两种桩的环境影响。 The present paper takes it as its interest to make a study of the environmental impact of the pile foundation construction. For this research purpose, we have chosen some environment-friendly construction plans based on CEPAS (Construction Environmental Performance Analysis System). In order to assure the objectivity of our assessment, two kinds of commonly used pile foundations were chosen, the manually excavated pile and CFG pile with long tube pump pressure so that it is easier to find the environmental impact of pile foundation construction and the environmental impacts resulting in the values of WTP (Willingness-to-pay) of 1 m^3 pile foundation. Next, a comparative analysis of environmental impact indexes and construction process was made to improve the environmental performance of pile foundation. The results of our analysis show that the value of WTP of 1 m^3 of manually excavated pile (178.94 yuan) tends to be much greater than CFG pile with long tube pump pressure (25.43 yuan), which indicates CFG pile with long tube pump pressure proves to be more optimal for promoting green construction. As to the manually excavated pile, further analysis has been done over the distribution of the environment impacts among the unit processes, which reveals that the steel processing and the concrete manufacture contribute together to the greatest portion (99.50%) of WTP. However, for CFG pile with long tube pump pressure, it was found that the compound preparation has much higher environmental impact as compared with any other unit processes, which may account for 89.46 % of WTP. It can be concluded that it would be more effective to stress these processes to improve the environmental performance for the two pile foundations.
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期81-84,共4页 Journal of Safety and Environment
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(50708053) 教育部博士点新教师基金项目(20070003062)
关键词 环境工程学 环境影响评价(EIA) 施工阶段 人工挖孔灌注桩 长螺旋钻孔管内泵压CFG桩 生命周期评价(LCA) environmental engineering environmental impact agsessmcnt ( EIA ) construction stage manually excavated pile CFG pile with long tube pump pressure life cycle assessment (LCA)
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1宋越.简述桩基础发展趋势[J].黑龙江科技信息,2009(14):238-238. 被引量:2
  • 2NIE Meisheng(聂梅生),QIN Youguo(秦佑国),JIANG Yi(江亿),et al.The evaluation system for eco-buildings in China(中国生态住宅技术评估手册)[M].Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2001. 被引量:1
  • 3Green Olympic Subject Study Group(绿色奥运课题研究组).Green Olympic building assessment system(绿色奥运建筑评估体系)[M].Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2003. 被引量:1
  • 4LI X D,SHEN Y M,ZHANG Z H.A new quantitative framework of environmental performance assessment applicable to construction stage[C] //Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Construction & Real Estate Management.Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2005:7-10. 被引量:1
  • 5LI Bin(李彬).The study and application of manually excavated pill(人工挖孔灌注桩的研究与实践)[D].Kunming:Kunming University of Science and Technology,2008. 被引量:1
  • 6LI Zhen(李真).The analysis on loading mechanism of the CFG pile composte foundation with long tube pump pressure(长螺旋钻孔管内泵压CFG桩复合地基受荷机理分析)[D].Kunming:Kunming University of Science and Technology,2008. 被引量:1
  • 7GB/T 24040-2008 Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and frameworks(环境管理-生命周期评价-原则与框架)[S]. 被引量:1
  • 8ZHANG Z H,LI X D,WU X.A life-cycle environmental impact of building assessment system:BEPAS[C] //Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Construction & Real Estate Management.Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2004:296-299. 被引量:1
  • 9FINNVEDEN G.A critical review of operational valuation/weighting methods for life cycle assessment[R].Stockholm:Swedish Environmental Protection Agency,1999. 被引量:1
  • 10李小冬,吴星,张智慧.基于LCA理论的环境影响社会支付意愿研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2005,37(11):1507-1510. 被引量:40

二级参考文献14

  • 1马中.环境与资源经济概论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999.. 被引量:5
  • 2FANKHAUSER S. Valuing Climate Change: the economics of the greenhouse[ M]. London: Earthcan Pub,1995. 46-53. 被引量:1
  • 3中国气候变化国别研究课题组.中国气候变化国别研究[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1999.13-14. 被引量:1
  • 4World Bank Office in Beijing. Montreal Protocol Projects[EB/OL]. http:∥www. worldbank. org. cn, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 5北京市统计局.北京市环境公报[R].北京:北京市统计局,2000-2002.. 被引量:1
  • 6国家发展与改革委员会 国家财政部 国家环保总局和国家经济贸易委员会.排污费征收标准管理办法.第31号令[Z].,2003.2.28.. 被引量:1
  • 7水利部.中国水资源公报[R].北京:水利部,2001-2003.. 被引量:1
  • 8中国水资源年鉴编委员.中国水资源年鉴2002[M].北京:中国水电出版社,2003.. 被引量:1
  • 9国家统计局.中国统计年鉴200-2002[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2001-2003.. 被引量:1
  • 10财政部.中华人民共和国资源税暂行条例实施细则.(93)财法字第43号[Z].,1998.12.30.. 被引量:1

共引文献40

同被引文献47

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部