摘要
孟子和荀子都尊崇孔子,二者都从孔子那里寻找知识和道德资源,并根据不同的理解形成各自的教学思想和观点。二者的分歧源自前者尊"德"而后者主"知",首先表现为人性论的不同解释,然后由人性论的不同解释演绎出二者不同的教学主张。孟子假设人性"善",主张"明心论",较注重德性修养,重视"思"、"行"和"自然之教";荀子假设人性"恶",主张"博学论",较注重知识学习,重视"学"、"知"和"人为之教"。
Both Mengzi and Xunzi respected Kongzi, and searched for knowledge and moral resources from him, and thus formed their own teaching ideas and viewpoints according to their different understandings. Differences between the two root in that the former respects ＂morality＂ and the latter advocates ＂knowledge＂. One is the different interpretation of human nature. The other is the different teaching ideas. Mengzi with his assumption of ＂good＂ human nature advocates the Theory of Mind and focuses on moral cultivation, thinking, doing and natural teaching. Xunzi with his assumption of ＂bad＂ human nature advocates the Theory of Knowing and focuses on learning of knowledge, learning, knowing and artificial teaching.
出处
《西南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第4期142-145,共4页
Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
中国古代教育
经典论战
明心论
博学论
自然之教
人为之教
Chinese ancient education
classic debate
theory of mind
theory of knowing
natural teaching
artificial teaching
