摘要
从权利救济的视角言,侠的历史在场与公力救济自身的缺陷是紧密相连的。在传统社会,公力救济信任机制的危机以及成本的高昂,为侠的在场提供了空间。当然,侠的历史退场,与侠的滥觞是有关联的,但侠的滥觞并不意味着侠所代表的私力救济机制的退场,应该理性地对待侠,在体制内对侠进行改造,从而为公力救济提供更有效的补充。
From the perspective of right remedy, presentation of chivalry in history is closely linked with the defects of the public remedy. In the traditional society, the confidential crisis and the high cost of the public remedy allowed the presence of ＂chivalry＂. Of course, its exit from the historic setting was closely linked with its overflow. But the exit of ＂chivalry＂ does not mean the exit of the public remedy represented by the ＂chivalry＂. We should take a rational view of ＂chivalry＂. We can reform the ＂chivalry＂ and make it an effective supplement of the public remedy.
出处
《西南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第4期36-40,共5页
Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)
