期刊文献+

兰索拉唑15mg与30mg治疗十二指肠溃疡效果及其安全性比较 被引量:5

COMPARISON OF LANSOPRAZOLE 15 MG AND 30 MG IN THE TREATMENT OF DUODENAL ULCER DISEASE IN CHINA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了比较兰索拉唑每日15mg与30mg两种剂量口服治疗十二指肠溃疡的效果及安全性,对109例经内镜证实活动性十二指肠溃疡随机分成15mg组(51例)和30mg组(58例)。剂量分别为每日15mg和30mg,疗程2~4周。于疗程结束后重复胃镜检查,2周溃疡愈合率15mg组为70.6%;30mg组为89.7%,30mg组明显高于15mg组(P<0.05)。4周溃疡愈合率15mg和30mg组分别为96.1%和98.3%,两组比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。3d,7d,14d的疼痛累积缓解率15mg组分别为55.4%(22/39);82.1%(32/39);92.3%(36/39);30mg组分别为68.8%(33/48);91.7%(44/48);100%(48/48)。两组比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。治疗中两组均未发生明显药物不良反应以及实验室指标的异常。研究结果表明兰索拉唑每日15mg,30mg均为中国人十二指肠溃疡病安全有效范围,而30mg更能促进溃疡的愈合。 In order to compare the efficacy of lansoprazole 15 mg and 30 mg (TAKEDA) daily in the treatment of duodenal ulcer disease, 109 patients with active duodenal ulcer proven by endoscopy randomized to lansoprazole 15 mg and 30 mg daily for 4 weeks. After 2 weeks complete ulcer healing was seen in 70.6% (36/51) of patients given 15 mg and in 89.7% (52/58) given 30 mg (between-group difference P<0.05). At 4 weeks 96.1% (49/51) and 98.3% (57/58) (not significant, P>0.05) respectively. The pain relief rate were 55.4% (22/39),82.1%(32/39) and 92.3% (36/39) by day 3,7, and 14 respectively, as compared with 68.8% (33/48), 91.7% (44/48) and 100% (48/48) of patients with lansoprazole 30 mg. Pronounced improvement in the other gastrointestinal symptoms were similar in both groups. Both treatments were equally well tolerated.Conclusion: 15 mg and 30 mg lansoprazole were shown to be highly effective and well-tolerated treatment for active duodenol ulcer disease in China. While the 30 mg lansoprazole showed a more rapid ulcer healing effect.
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1999年第1期22-25,共4页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
关键词 兰索拉唑 十二指肠溃疡 药物疗法 剂量 lansoprazole duodenal ulcer disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

共引文献8

同被引文献38

  • 1高萍,许国铭,邹多武.奥美拉唑和硫糖铝治疗十二指肠球部溃疡胃内24小时pH监测[J].中华消化杂志,1995,15(5):259-260. 被引量:20
  • 2许铁男.抗溃疡药 兰索拉唑[J].国外医药(合成药.生化药.制剂分册),1995,16(4):245-247. 被引量:15
  • 3萧树东,刘文忠.幽门螺杆菌感染与胃粘膜上皮细胞增殖和凋亡[J].中华内科杂志,1997,36(4):219-220. 被引量:19
  • 4McColm AA,Mclaren A,Klinkert G,et al.Ranitidine bismuth citrate:a novel anti-ulcer agent with different physico-chemical characteristics and improved biological activity to a bismuth citrate-ranitidine admixture[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther,1996,10(3)∶241-2 被引量:1
  • 5Hunt RH,Fallone CA,Thomson ABR,et al.The Canadian Helicobacter study group.Canadian Helicobacter pylori consensus conference update:infection in adults[J].Can J Gastroenterol,1999,13(3):213-217. 被引量:1
  • 6Malfertheiner P,Megraud F,O'Morain C,et al.Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht 2-2000 Consensus Report[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2002,16(2):167-180. 被引量:1
  • 7Laheij RJ,Rossum LG,Jansen JB,et al.Evaluation of treatment regimens to cure Helicobacter pylori infection a meta analysis[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther,1999,13(6):857-864. 被引量:1
  • 8Pinkin GA,Williamson R,Wood JR,et al.Review article:one week clarithromycin triple regimens for eradication of Helicobacter pylori[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther,1998,12(8):823-837. 被引量:1
  • 9Savarino V,Zentilin P,Pivari,et al.The impact of antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of three 7-day regimens against H.pylori infection[J].Gastroenterology,1999,116(4):A302-303. 被引量:1
  • 10Bago J,Halle ZB,Strinic D,et al.The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs.omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H.pylori eradication-a randomised controlled trial[J].Wien Klin Wochenschr,2002,114 被引量:1

引证文献5

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部