期刊文献+

环境管制程度对FDI区位选择影响的实证分析 被引量:14

The Empirical Analysis of the FDI's Choice of Disctrict under Different Environment Supervision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文将外商投资企业(FDI)细分为合资企业、合作企业和独资企业三种形式后,利用省际面板数据重新审视了地方环境管制水平对FDI区位选择的影响及其区域差异,并基于风险偏好的视角对以上发现进行了分析。研究显示,不同类型FDI进行区位选择时对环境管制的偏好有别,其中合作企业偏好环境管制标准较高的省份,独资企业则相反,合资企业介乎二者之间。另外,FDI对地方环境管制水平的偏好也存在明显的区域差异,东部环境管制水平较高的省份更容易引进FDI,而在"独资化"比例逐步加大的趋势下,中西部地区要警惕成为部分FDI(尤其是独资企业)的"污染避难所"。 This paper divides foreign direct investment enterprises into joint venture, cooperative enterprise and sole proprietorship, uses inter-provincial panel data to analysis the effect by the differences of environment supervision and district based on the visual angle of risk partiality. Result shows that different enterprises have different preferences of the environment supervi- sion, the joint venture prefer the provinces with environment supervision of high standard, the sole proprietorships choose the provinces with low environment control and the cooperatives are between them. Besides this, different districts shows different attraction to the FDI, the east provinces are much easier to bring in FDI, and the middle and west provinces should avoid to be the pollution heaven with the trend that the proportion of the sole proprietorship is raising.
出处 《南方经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期39-50,共12页 South China Journal of Economics
基金 国家社科基金"中国对外开放的环境效应研究" 国家重点招标社科基金"贯彻落实科学发展观与加快转变经济发展方式研究"资助
关键词 环境管制 FDI细分 “污染避难所假说” 区域差异 Environment Supervision Classification of FDI Pollution Heaven District Difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Arellano,M.and Bond S.,1991,Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data:Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations,Review of Economic Studies,58,277-297. 被引量:1
  • 2Blackman,A.and Wu,X.,1999,Foreign Direct Investment in China's Power Sector:Trends,Benefits and Barriers,Energy Policy,27(12),695-711. 被引量:1
  • 3Cole,M.A.and Elliott,R.J.R,2006,Endogenous Pollution Havens:Does FDI Influence Environmental Regulations?,Scandinavian Journal of Economics,108(2),157-178. 被引量:1
  • 4Dean,J.M,Lovely,M.E.and Wang,H.,2005,Are Foreign Investors Attracted to Weak Environmental Regulations? Evaluating the Evidence from China,World Bank Policy Research Working Paper,3505. 被引量:1
  • 5Esty,D.C.and Geradin,1998,Environmental Protection and International Competitiveness,Journal of World Trade,5. 被引量:1
  • 6Eskeland,G.S.and Harrison,A.E.,2003,Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution haven hypothesis,Journal of Development Economics,70,1-23. 被引量:1
  • 7Garcia,H.and Afsah,S.,2009,Which Firms are More Sensitive to Public Disclosure Schemes of Pollution Control? Evidence from Indonesia's Proper Program,Environment Resource Economy,42,151-168. 被引量:1
  • 8He,J.,2006,Pollution Haven Hypothesis and Environmental Impacts of Foreign Direct Investment:The Case of Industrial Emission of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)in Chinese Provinces,Ecological Economics,60,228-245. 被引量:1
  • 9Head,K.,Ries,J.and Swenson,D.,1995,Agglomeration Benefits and Location Choice:Evidence from Japanese Manufacturing Investments in the United States,Journal of International Economics,38(3),223-247. 被引量:1
  • 10Head,K.and Ries,J.,1996,Inter-City Competition for Foreign Direct Investment in China:Static and Dynamic Effects of China's Incentive Areas,Journal of Urban Economics,40,38-60. 被引量:1

二级参考文献160

共引文献696

同被引文献275

二级引证文献612

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部