摘要
关于《香港特别行政区基本法》的解释权,《基本法》第158条作了明确规定,但对该条的理解一直存有争议。结合《基本法》的指导思想——"一国两制"原则,笔者认为:《基本法》的解释权首先属于全国人大常委会,全国人大常委会对其享有全面的最终的解释权。在此前提下,通过全国人大常委会授权,香港特别行政区法院在审理案件时才可以对《基本法》的部分条款进行解释。这种解释主体的双重性和解释权的分割是"一国两制"在《基本法》解释权上的充分体现。
As far as the interpretative power of the Basic Law is concerned, Item 158. has made clear stipulations, but there is constant dispute about it. Taking into account the guiding principle ＂One country, two systems＂ of the Basic Law , the author concludes that the interpretative power first and foremostly belongs to the standing committee of the national people＇s congress and the committee is entitled to the complete and final interpretative power. Under such a prerequisite, only through the authorization of the NPC can the court of Hong Kong Special Administrative District interpret some of the items of the Basic Law when trying cases. Such a duality of interpretative subject and division of interpretative power is a manifestation of ＂One country, two systems＂ embodied in the interpretative power of the Basic Law.
出处
《内蒙古师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2010年第2期107-110,共4页
Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
《香港特别行政区基本法》
全国人大常委会
香港特区法院
解释
授权
自治
征询
Basic Law for Hong Kong Special Administrative District
the standing committee of the national people＇s congress of China
Court of Hong Kong Special Administrative District
interpretation
authorization
autonomy
