期刊文献+

积极推进中小学校教育质量评价改革 被引量:13

On Educational Quality Evaluation Reform in Primary and Secondary Schools in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 缺乏共识、缺失标准和有失公平是当前我国中小学校教育质量评价面临的三大困境。借鉴国外经验,建立以学生学业成就评价为基础、目标分层、多级评价、多元参与的评价机制,并以对学生发展的增值作用作为评价标准,是进一步改革和完善我国中小学校教育质量评价的努力方向。 Being short of consensus, being absent of standard and lacking equity are the three predicaments that educational quality evaluation is facing in primary and secondary schools in China. To learn from the foreign experiences, establish the evaluation mechanism on the basis of students" academic performance, objective delamination, multi-evaluation and multi-participation, and take the role of value-added of student development as the evaluation standard, are the direction to further reform and perfect educational quality evaluation in primary and secondary schools in China.
作者 马晓强
出处 《教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期34-39,共6页 Educational Research
关键词 教育质量 评价 学业成就 中小学 educational quality, evaluation, academic performance, primary and secondary schools
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1陈桂生著..“教育学视界”辨析[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1997:472.
  • 2布卢姆.教育评价[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1987.. 被引量:75
  • 3沈玉顺,卢建萍.制定教育评价标准的若干方法分析[J].高等师范教育研究,2000,12(2):21-26. 被引量:18
  • 4上海市中小学“学校发展性督导评价”指标纲要[EB/OL].http://fzxpj.cersp.com/xxpj/200511/104.html. 被引量:1
  • 5北京市区县政府、教委、中小学校、幼儿园全面实施素质教育评价方案(试行)[EB/OL].http://www.bjedu.gov.cn/bjsjwcs/652178620550217728/20080516/61812.shtml. 被引量:2
  • 6James S. Coleman, et al. Equality of Education Opportunity [ M ]. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1966. 被引量:1
  • 7国家教育发展研究中心.发达国家教育改革的动向和趋势(第四集)[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1992,8.. 被引量:17
  • 8王修娥.美国“蓝带学校”计划修订始末[J].上海教育,2002(17):44-45. 被引量:6
  • 9周满生,吕达.发达国家教育改革的动向和趋势(第七集)[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2004.82. 被引量:3
  • 10Frame Work for the Inspection of Schools: Paper for Consultation [R]. Issued by Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools in England, 1995. 被引量:1

二级参考文献21

  • 1[美]Murphy M.M.著 周玲 张学文泽.美国“蓝带学校”的品性教育—应对挑战的最佳实践.[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2002.. 被引量:1
  • 2http ://www. ed. gov/programs/nclbbrs/awards. html. 被引量:1
  • 3James s. Coleman,et al. Equality of education opportunity, US department of health, education and welfare , 1966. 被引量:1
  • 4Sally Thomas. Evaluation of RSSI Using Value Added Measures of School Performance. Final Project Report, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 5Lesley Saunders,ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMSAND PROCESSES: " Value Added': Telling the Truth about Schools" Performance? http://wwwl.worldbank.org/educa-tion/est/resources/topic%20papers/Valueadded.doc. 被引量:1
  • 6Ren Chunrong. A Pilot Assessment on Secondary School Effectiveness in Beijing with Vale Added Models. Project Report, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 7Yang Xijie , The Effect of Schools on College Entrance Examination Achievement, Project Report, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 8Cave, M., Hanney, S., Kogan, M. and Trevett, G. (1988), The Use of Performance Indilators in Higher Education AGritical Analysis of Developing Practice, Jessica Kingsley Publishers 被引量:1
  • 9Craft.A (ed)(1994),International Deuelipments in Assuring Quality in Higher Education,The Falrner Press 被引量:1
  • 10Kells,H.R.(1993),The Developmnet of performance Indicators for Higher Edttcation A Comperdiam of tuelve Countries ,OECD 被引量:1

共引文献219

同被引文献202

引证文献13

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部