期刊文献+

激光泪道成形联合插管治疗泪道阻塞远期疗效 被引量:2

YAG laser plastic operation assisted intubation for lacrimal passage obstruction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨激光泪道成形联合插管治疗泪道阻塞的远期疗效。方法泪道阻塞120例(120眼),随机分为两组:对照组60例单纯行激光泪道成形术;试验组60例行激光泪道成形联合插管治疗。术后门诊复诊冲洗泪道并记录溢泪症状和不良情况,必要时进行适当处理。随访3年。结果完成随访113例(对照组56例,试验组57例),失访7例(5.83%),两组基线比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。在随访第1年两组疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),第2年两组疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随访3年发现试验组较对照组效果好(P=0.002),且3年来对照组总有效率在逐年下降(P<0.05)而试验组总有效率基本保持稳定(P>0.05)。虽然两组均有并发症发生,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论激光泪道成形联合插管治疗泪道阻塞较单纯激光泪道成形术远期疗效稳定而可靠。 Objective To assess the efficacy of YAG laser plastic operation assisted intubation for lacrimal passage obstruction. Methods A randomized trial was designed,120 patients(120 eyes) with lacrimal passage obstruction were divided into two groups.The control group was treated by means of YAG laser plastic operation and the trial group was treated by YAG laser plastic operation assisted intubation of lacrimal passage.Followed-up survey for 3 years at the ophthalmologic outpatient clinic,they were irrigated lacrimal duct regularly and recorded the symptoms of epiphora and adverse events.Therapeutic effects of the two groups was contrasted. Results There were 113 cases(113 eyes) with complete information(56 cases in control group and 57 cases in trial group).Lost to follow-up happened in 7 cases with drop-out rate of 5.83%.Baseline analysis demonstrated that the two groups were comparable.The comparison of the therapeutic effects was not statistical difference between control group and trial group in the first year(P〉0.05).In the second year,there was statistical difference between the two groups(P〈0.05).Period of 3 years,the trial group was more effective than the control group.The total efficiency of the control group decreased gradually(P〈0.05),but it remained stable in trial group(P〉0.05).Although the complications emerged in the two groups,there was not statistical difference between the two groups(P〈0.05). Conclusion YAG laser plastic operation assisted intubation for lacrimal passage obstruction was safe and stable,it is a recommended operation with less tissue hurt,no scar by simply operation.
出处 《眼外伤职业眼病杂志》 2010年第5期371-373,共3页 Journal of Injuries and Occupational Diseases of the Eye with Ophthalmic Surgeries
关键词 泪道阻塞 YAG激光 鼻泪管插管 lacrimal passage obstruction YAG laser intubation of lacrimal passage
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献25

  • 1孙叙清,戴青,罗丰年,杜刚,张磊,李晖,黄金峰.应用激光治疗慢性泪道阻塞性疾病的几个问题[J].国际眼科杂志,2004,4(5):905-907. 被引量:35
  • 2黄雄高,艾明.泪道植管联合泪道注药治疗泪道阻塞[J].医学临床研究,2005,22(3):320-321. 被引量:7
  • 3李晓陵 尹素云.Nd:YAG激光泪小管损伤的实验研究[J].泪液学杂志,1992,2:4-4. 被引量:22
  • 4蔡明泉 王智 等.简易U形插管术治疗泪道阻塞的远期观察[J].泪液学杂志,1992,2(1):13-13. 被引量:9
  • 5孙叙清 戴青 黄薇 等.激光插管治疗鼻泪管阻塞[J].实用医药杂志,1993,6:15-16. 被引量:6
  • 6Woo KI, Moon SH, Kim YD. Transcanalicular laser-assisted revision of failed dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Surg Laser, 1998, 29:451-455. 被引量:1
  • 7Kaufman LM, Guay-Bhatia LA. Monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology, 1998, 105:336-341. 被引量:1
  • 8朱豫 高永峰 等.眼科诊疗新技术[M].北京:科技出版社,2001.186-190. 被引量:24
  • 9宋琛.手术学全集.眼科卷[M].北京:人民军医出版社,1996.279-283. 被引量:4
  • 10Wearne MJ, Beigi B, Davis G, Rose GE. Retrograde intubation dacryocystorhinostomy for proximal and midcanalicular obstruction. Ophthalmology,1999;106:2325-2329. 被引量:1

共引文献151

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部