期刊文献+

应对量表的结构效度研究 被引量:14

A Validation Study of the Coping Inventory (COPE)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:对应对量表(COPE)的结构效度进行探索和验证。方法:使用COPE分别对北京市21所高校1725名研究生(随机分为两个样本,样本1=828,样本2=897)以及某国家机关419名工作人员(样本3)进行施测。结果:首先使用研究生样本1对COPE可能存在的二阶因子进行探索性因素分析(EFA),得到3个二阶因子;然后使用研究生样本2对EFA所得到的二阶模型以及竞争模型进行验证性因素分析(CFA),并同时对样本3进行跨样本的结构效度检验。结果显示,一阶相关模型拟合度指数(χ2/df=2.76/2.04,CFI=0.855/0.828,GFI=0.849/0.788,AGFI=0.828/0.758,NFI=0.792/0.715,IFI=0.857/0.831,RMSEA=0.044/0.043)基本符合统计学要求,优于其他竞争模型。结论:COPE的维度结构更符合一阶模型,因子间存在不同程度的相关。 Objective: To explore and validate the dimensionality of the Coping Inventory (COPE). Methods: 1725 graduate students from 21 colleges in Beijing and 419 functionaries from state organs completed the COPE. Results: The sample of graduate students was randomly split into two samples. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on the data of Sample 1 (N1=828) to explore the hierarchical dimensionality of COPE, which resulted in 3 second-order factors. Then the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted on the data of Sample 2 (N2=897) and Sample 3 (N3= 419), to compare the four assumed models. As the multiple indexes of the oblique first-order model (χ2/df=2.76/2.04,CFI= 0.855/0.828,GFI =0.849/0.788,AGFI =0.828/0.758,NFI =0.792/0.715,IFI =0.857/0.831,RMSEA =0.044/0.043) and the significant difference of chi -squire between nested models indicated that it was better than other competitive models. Conclusion: COPE is a first-order multidimensional instrument. The psychometric properies of COPE is discussed.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2010年第1期5-7,4,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目资助(30870777) 第42批中国博士后科学基金面上资助(33107029)
关键词 应对量表(COPE) 探索性因素分析 验证性因素分析 拟合度指数 COPE Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) Goodness-of-fit index
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1张怡玲,甘怡群.国外应对研究的不同理论视角[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(3):321-323. 被引量:46
  • 2Somerfield MR, McCrae RR. Stress and coping research: Methodological challenges, theretical advances and clinical application. American Psychologist, 2000, 55:620-625. 被引量:1
  • 3梁宝勇,郭良才,郭倩玉,刘畅,杜桂芝.关于应付的一些思考与实证研究 Ⅰ.应付的概念模式与效果估价[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1999,7(3):188-190. 被引量:87
  • 4Lazarus RS. Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1993, 55:234-247. 被引量:1
  • 5Aldwin C. Stress, coping, and developmen. New York: Guilford Press, 1994. 被引量:1
  • 6Stone A, Neale J. New measure of daily coping: Development and preliminary results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46:892-906. 被引量:1
  • 7Folkman S, Lazarus RS. Ways of Coping Questionnaire: Research edition. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1988. 被引量:1
  • 8Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 56:267-283. 被引量:1
  • 9Endler NS, Parker JDA. Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, 58:844-854. 被引量:1
  • 10Amirkhan JH. A factor analytically derived measure of coping: The coping strategy indicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, 59:1066-1074. 被引量:1

二级参考文献53

共引文献449

同被引文献172

引证文献14

二级引证文献215

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部