摘要
目的:探讨两种护理模式在胸外重症患者中的应用效果。方法:将46例患者随机分为实验组和对照组各23例,实验组给予循证护理,对照组给予常规护理。采用SF-36量表对两组于护理前、护理后进行评分,并调查并发症发生率、患者及家属满意度。结果:实验组在SF-36量表评估、患者及家属满意度方面均优于对照组(P<0.05),且并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:将循证护理用于胸外重症患者中,可降低并发症的发生率,提高患者及家属的满意度。
Objective：To evaluate the effect of the two different nursing models for the patients with critical conditions in thoracic surgery department. Methods：46 patients were randomly divided into experimental and control groups （23 cases for each group）. The evidence-based nursing care was adopted in the experimental group and routine nursing care was taken in the control group. SF-36 scale was used to mark scores before and after nursing care in both groups,the incidence of complications and satisfaction of the patients and their families were investigated. Results：The scores of SF-36 scale and the satisfaction of the patients and their families were higher and better in the experimental group than those in the control group （P0.05）,and the incidence of complications was lower in the experimental group than that in the control group （P0.05）. Conclusion：Evidence-based nursing care for the patients with critical conditions in thoracic surgery department can reduce the incidence of complications and improve the satisfaction of the patients and their families.
关键词
循证护理
常规护理
胸外重症患者
Evidence-based nursing care
Routine nursing care
Patient with critical conditions
