摘要
目的:通过对常规皮内注射方法与留置气泡(A-b)皮内注射法在药物皮内试验操作后并发症的对比,为临床皮内注射技术选择和改进提供依据。方法:选用需做药物皮内试验操作住的院患者126例,分别使用常规皮内注射法和A-b皮内注射法,观察并记录注射后药(血)液外溢、疼痛等不良反应发生率的情况。结果:126例患者中,A-b皮内注射法给药不良反应发生率低于常规皮内注射法给药(P<0.05)。结论:A-b皮内注射法较常规皮内注射法所致局部不良反应发生率低,药物利用度高,更适合于临床应用。
Objective：To provide a basis for chosing and improving of ID injection techniques,through the complications contrast of different methods：conventional ID injection technique and A-b （retention bubble） ID injection technique when do the medicine skin test. Methods：To choose 126 inpatient cases ,and to give them the medicine skin test with different injection techniques： conventional ID injection technique and A-b （retention bubble） ID injection technique,and to observe the difference of the incidence rate of drugs （blood） fluid leaking out, pain and other adverse reactions. Results：In the126 cases, incidence of adverse reactions of ID injection with A-b （retention bubble） technique were lower than that with conventional technique （P〈0.05）.Conclusion：A-b （retention bubble） ID injection technique can be used with a a lower incidence of local adverse reactions, compared with conventional one,and it＇s medicine utilization rate are high and it is more suitable for clinical application.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2010年第13期122-123,共2页
China Modern Medicine
关键词
留置气泡
皮内试验
护理
A-b （retention bubble） ID injection technique
ID test
Nursing
