期刊文献+

胃癌根治术腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫安全性与有效性的Meta分析 被引量:4

Meta-analysis of safety and efficacy on paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价胃癌根治术腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫的安全性与有效性。方法2位评价者制定检索策略,利用PubMed和Medline等数据库检索胃癌手术腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫的随机对照研究,运用固定效应模型与随机效应模型对术中腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫与否的两组胃癌患者手术的安全性与有效性进行Meta分析。结果符合入选标准的随机对照临床试验7项共计胃癌根治术患者1446例。与非腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫组比较,腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫组患者术后并发症总发生率升高(RR1.34,95%CI1.03~1.75,P=0.03):术后出现淋巴瘘和严重腹泻者增多(RR分别为16.23和9.56,95%CI分别为1.99~131.98和1.70~53.67);而术后吻合口瘘、胰瘘、腹腔脓肿、肠梗阻、出血和伤口感染等发生率未见明显升高。腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫组术中出血量及输血人数比例增加(WMD202.95,95%CI116.80.289.10:RR1.93,95%CI1.20。3.10:均P〈0.05),但手术时间、平均输血量、平均术后住院天数、再次手术率、术后复发率和5年生存率等与D2/D3术式相近。结论腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术后并发症总发生率升高,并不能降低术后复发率、提高生存率,其临床疗效尚有待更严格的、多中心的、具有长期随访的大宗病例研究来证实。 Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer with meta-analysis. Methods Randomized controlled trial comparing D2/D3 and D2/D3 plus paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer were identified by two investigators after search strategy was established. Seven randomized controlled trials with 1446 cases were included in this meta-analysis. Fixed effect model or random model was separately used to evaluate the safety and efficacy of paraaortic lymphadeneetomy in gastric cancer. Results Total complication rate in the D2/D3 plus paraaortie lymphadenectomy group was significantly higher than that in the D2/D3 group(RR 1.34,95% CI 1.03- 1.75,P=0.03), while surgery associated complication between the two groups was almost the same. Lymphorrhea and severe diarrhea was more common in the D2/D3 plus paraaortic lymphadenectomy (RR 16.23 and 9.56, 95% CI 1.99-131.98 and 1.70-53.67, respectively). Anastomotic leak, pancreatic fistula, abdominal abscess, ileus, postoperative bleeding and wound infection were similar. There were no advantages in operating time, amount of blood transfusion, in-hospital stay, reoperation, recurrence and 5-year survival favoring the paraaortic lymphadeneetomy group except intra-operative blood loss and rate of blood transfusion(WMD 202.95, 95% CI 116.80-289.10; RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.20-3.10). Conclusions Paraaortic lymphadenectomy is associated with increased total complication without altering postoperative recurrence and survival. Strict large-scale muhicenter controlled trials with long-term follow-up are required.
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第2期119-124,共6页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
关键词 胃肿瘤 主动脉 胃切除术 淋巴结清扫术 META分析 Stomach neoplasms Aorta, abdominal Gastrectomy Lymph node dissection Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Bonenkamp JJ,Hermans J,Sasako M,et al.Extended lymphnode dissection for gastric cancer.N Engl J Med,1999,340(12):908-914. 被引量:1
  • 2Cuschieri A,Weeden S,Fielding J,et al.Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer:long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial.Surgical Co-operative Group.Br J Cancer,1999,79(9-10):1522-1530. 被引量:1
  • 3Kajitani T.The general roles for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology.Part Ⅰ.Clinical classification.Jpn J Surg,1981,11(2):127-139. 被引量:1
  • 4Sasako M,McCulloch P,Kinoshita T,et al.New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.Br J Surg,1995,82(3):346-351. 被引量:1
  • 5Wu CW,Hsiung CA,Lo SS,et al.Randomized clinical trial of morbidity after D1 and D3 surgery for gastric cancer.Br J Surg,2004,91(3):283-287. 被引量:1
  • 6Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancinoma-2nd English Edition.Gastric Cancer,1998,1(1):10-24. 被引量:1
  • 7Sobin LH,Wittekind C.TNM classification of malignant tumours.6th ed.New York:Wiley-liss,2002. 被引量:1
  • 8Baba M,Hokita S,Natsugoe S,et al.Paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced carcinoma of the upper-third of the stomach.Hepatogastroenterology,2000,47(33):893-896. 被引量:1
  • 9Isozaki H,Okajima K,Fujii K,et al.Effectiveness of paraaortic lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer.Hepatogastroenterology,1999,46(25):549-554. 被引量:1
  • 10Maeta M,Yamashiro H,Saito H,et al.A prospective pilot study of extended (D3) and superextended para-aortic lymphadenectomy (D4) in patients with T3 or T4 gastric cancer managed by total gastrectomy.Surgery,1999,125(3):325-331. 被引量:1

二级参考文献9

  • 1庞达,薛英威,董新舒,张岂凡,隋雨辰,赵家宏,丁立.胃癌R_4式手术的临床及解剖学研究(附81例临床分析)[J].中国实用外科杂志,1994,14(10):605-607. 被引量:16
  • 2Erika T,Natsugoe S,Hokita S.Extended gastricsurgery:is para-aortic lymph node dissection essential for advanced gastric cancer[J].Ganto Kagaku Ryoho,1998,25(4):498-503. 被引量:1
  • 3Manzoni G,Verlato G,Guglielmi A,et al.Prognostic significance of lymph nodedissection in gastric cancer[J].British J Surg,1996,83(11):1604-1607. 被引量:1
  • 4Kitamura M,Arai K,Iwasaki Y.Clinico-pathological studies and problems onpara-aortic lymph node dissection-D4 dissection[J].Nippon Geka GakkaiZasshi,1996,97(11):302-307. 被引量:1
  • 5Kitamura M.Clinico-pathological studies on para-aortic lymph node metastasis andpostoperative quality of life in gastric cancer patients[A].In:Nishi M.FirstInternational Gastric Cancer Congress[M].Bologna,Italy:Monduzzi Editore,1995.1151. 被引量:1
  • 6西满正 太田惠一郎 石原省.胃癌における大动脉周围リンパ节转移[J].消化器外科,1991,14(1):165-168. 被引量:1
  • 7矶崎博司 冈岛邦雄 山田真一.胃癌に对する扩大手术と缩小手术[J].消化器外科,1993,6(9):1515-1521. 被引量:2
  • 8高桥俊雄.リンパ流ガろみた胃癌の合理的手术[J].消化器外科,1993,16(8):1365-1389. 被引量:1
  • 9北村正次.胃癌における大动脉周围リンパ节廓清の成绩とその功罪[J].外科治疗,1995,73(2):301-306. 被引量:1

共引文献10

同被引文献81

引证文献4

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部