摘要
对于《太极图》与《太极图说》而言,许多人认为"传图者必传说"。但是,把上述主张绝对化,会忽视一些非常重要的史料。据祁宽、朱子等人的一系列资料来看,《通书》的最初版本"九江本"并非如大家所认为的那样,没有收录《太极图》与《太极图说》,而只是没有收录《太极图》。基于此,我们还需要重新审视潘兴嗣《先生墓志铭》文中的句读问题、《太极图》的最初面貌问题、《太极图》与《太极图说》与道家的渊源问题,以弄清《太极图》与《太极图说》的关系。最后,本文还通过对《诸儒鸣道集》所收《通书》与朱子所整理的各《通书》版本进行比较,进一步分析了《通书》最初版本的可能面貌。
Many people believe the author who draws Taijitu,must writes Taijitushuo either.However,if absolutely insist the above viewpoint,we will ignore some important materials.According to some materials by QI Kuan and ZHU Xi,the first version of Tongshu incorporates Taijitushuo.To clarify the relation between Taijitu and Taijitushuo,we still need to re-exam his epitaph written by PAN Xing-si,the original appearance of Taijitu and the relation between Taijitu,Taijitushuo and Daoism.In the last part,this paper further analyse the original version of Tongshu by comparing the version of Zhurumingdaoji and the version arranged by ZHU Xi.
出处
《周易研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第2期30-36,共7页
Studies of Zhouyi
关键词
周敦颐
太极图
太极图说
“鸣道本”
《通书》
ZHIOU Dun-yi
Taijitu
Taijitushuo
the version of ZhuruMingdaoji
Tongshu
