期刊文献+

不同应答等级对likert式量表特性的影响 被引量:100

Effect of Different Response Levels on the Characteristics of Likert-type Rating Scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 量表或调查表的设计是调查研究的关键环节,量表的特性对调查质量至关重要。Likert式量表广泛应用于流行病学、慢性病防控、传染病防控、心理健康、生命质量、儿童少年卫生、营养卫生等公共卫生领域及其他社会学领域的调查研究,而不同应答等级对量表的特性即信度、效度会产生较大的影响。本文综述了在量表设计时不同应答等级、中性中间点及选项的形式对量表收集数据特征和特性的影响。 The design of Scale or questionnaire is a key point to investigations. Good psychometric properties of scale, witch means good reliability and validity, are essential to the quality of investigations. Likert-type scale is widely used in public health research fields, such as researches in epidemiology, prevention and control of chronic diseases, infectious diseases, mental health, quality of life, etc., and other areas of sociological research. Different levels of response options will have a great impact on the psychometric properties of Likert-type scale. In this paper, we discussed the impact of different levels of response options, the neutral mid-point and the effect of response options forms on data features and psychometric properties of Likert-type scale.
出处 《中国慢性病预防与控制》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第2期215-217,共3页 Chinese Journal of Prevention and Control of Chronic Diseases
关键词 likert式量表 应答等级 中性中间点 选项形式 信度 效度 Likert-type scale Response level Neutral mid-point Option forms Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory [M], 3nd Edition. New York: Mc- Graw-Hill, 1994. 被引量:1
  • 2James RM. The relationship between number of response categories and reliability oflikert-type questionnaires [J]. J Edu Meas, 1974, 11: 49- 53. 被引量:1
  • 3EU P. COX IIl. The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: a review[J]. J Mark Res, 1980, 17: 407-422. 被引量:1
  • 4Duane F, Alwin. Information transmission in the survey interview: number of response categories and the reliability of attitude measurement[J]. Soeio Meth, 1992, 22:83-118. 被引量:1
  • 5Debroah LB,Craig KE. The effects of nonnormality and number of response categories on reliability[J]. Appl Meas Educ, 1996, 9: 151-160. 被引量:1
  • 6Carolyn CP, Andrew MC. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent Preferences[J]. Acta Psychol, 2000, 104: 1-15. 被引量:1
  • 7Li-Jen Weng. Impact of the number of response categories and anchorlabels on coefficient alpha and test-retest reliability [J]. Educ Psychol Meas, 2004, 64: 956-972. 被引量:1
  • 8Luis ML, Eduardo Garcta-Cueto. Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales [J].Methodology, 2008, 4: 73-79. 被引量:1
  • 9Alberto Maydeu-Olivares, Uwe K, Donna C. The effect of varying the number of response alternatives in rating scales: experimental evidence from intra-individual effects[ J ]. Behav Res Meth, 2009, 41: 295-308. 被引量:1
  • 10Jacob Y, Michael SM. Three-point likert scales are good enough [J]. J Market Res, 1971, 3:495-500. 被引量:1

二级参考文献4

共引文献24

同被引文献947

引证文献100

二级引证文献545

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部