摘要
刑法上的原因自由行为,在大陆法系国家刑法学界,历来有众多学说对立。为维护"实行行为与责任同在"之原则,通常要将实行行为的范围扩大到原因行为阶段或者类比于间接正犯,但也由此产生众多问题。根据我国犯罪构成理论,原因自由行为性质上当属修正的构成要件行为。遵循"行为与责任同在"原则,原因行为必须在故意或过失的支配下,结合基本的构成要件行为,方具有可罚性。在我国的立法上,对原因自由行为的规定过于单一,应当借鉴其他国家或地区的立法例加以完善。
Action libera in causa in criminal law is a controversial issue among criminal law scholars in civil law countries. To support the principle ＂ responsibility must be existed with executive conduct at the same time＂, it is usual to expand the executive conduct to the actio in casa stage or make it as the indirect offender, but at the same time, it will result in many new problems. According to China＇s crime constitutes theory, the actio libera in causa ought to be the behavior of amendatory constitution of crime. When the actio in causa is dominated by intent or negligence and combined with the conduct of the basic constitution of crime, it is punishable. The national criminal legislation on the actio libera in causa is too limited that we should improve them on the basis of experiences of other countries or regions.
出处
《广东广播电视大学学报》
2010年第2期22-26,42,共6页
Journal of Guangdong Radio & Television University
关键词
原因自由行为
修正的构成要件行为
可罚性
未遂犯
actio libera in causa
behavior of amendatory constitution of crime
punishable
attempted offense
