期刊文献+

不同剂量芬太尼对靶控输注异丙酚诱导时药效学的影响 被引量:5

Effects of different doses of fentanyl on the pharmacodynamics during combined with target controled infusion of propofol anesthesia induction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察不同剂量芬太尼对异丙酚靶控输注(TCI)全麻诱导时药效学的影响。方法全麻患者84例,按芬太尼不同诱导剂量随机分成芬太尼2、4、6、8μg/kg组。麻醉诱导:静脉注射不同剂量芬太尼,靶控输注异丙酚,当(脑电双频谱指数)BIS达到(45±5)时静脉注射维库溴铵0.1mg/kg4min后气管插管、机械通气。观察麻醉前(T0)、静注芬太尼4min后(T1)、意识消失时(T2)、BIS数值降至(45±5)时(T3)、气管插管即刻(T4)、插管后3min(T5)、插管后5min(T6)时收缩压(SP)、心率(HR)、BIS值和T2、T3时异丙酚的靶控输注浓度(Ce)值和用药剂量。同时记录T1~T2(T1~2)、T1~T3(T1~3)的时间及麻醉期间不良事件发生率和气管插管反应发生情况。结果在T2、T3时芬太尼4、6、8μg/kg组患者所需异丙酚Ce、用药剂量、所需时间均较芬太尼2μg/kg组低(P<0.05);T2时,T1~2时间和用药剂量在6μg/kg组较4μg/kg组减少(P<0.05);T3时,T1~3时间和用药剂量在6μg/kg组和4μg/kg组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);气管插管反应发生率芬太尼2μg/kg组较其它3组高(P<0.05),心动过缓/呛咳反应的发生率6、8μg/kg组较2、4μg/kg组高(P<0.05)。结论4种剂量的芬太尼都能增强异丙酚的镇静作用,减少麻醉诱导时间,其中4μg/kg麻醉诱导时芬太尼的协同作用较为明显且循环稳定。 Objective To investigate the effects of different doses of fentanyl on the pharmacodynamics during combined with target controled infusion(TCI)of propofol anesthesia induction and appropriate dose of fentanyl and the target effect-site concentration of TCI propofol.Methods Eighty four patients with general anesthesia were enrolled,and were divided into 4 groups according to different induction doses of fentanyl:fentanyl 2,4,6,8 μg/kg.Anesthesia was induced with iv injection of fentanyl 2,4,6 and 8 μg/kg within 1 min,TCI of propofol.Tracheal intubation was facilitated with vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg iv when BIS decreased to(45±5).The patients were mechanically ventilated.Systolic pressure(SP),heart rate(HR),Bispectral index(BIS)were recorded before induction of anesthesia(T0),at 4 min after injection of fentanyl(T1),lost of consciouse(T2),the BIS decreased to(45±5)(T3),immediately(T4)and at 3 min(T5),5 min(T6)after tracheal intubation.The Ce and consumption of propofol at T2,T3,the time from T1 to T2(T1-2),T1 to T3(T1-3)and the devise cardiovascular events were also recorded.Results The Ce,consumption of propofol at T2 and T3 and the time T1-2,T1-3 were significantly smaller in the groups of fentanyl 4,6,8 μg/kg than 2 μg/kg.The consumption of propofol and the time T1-2 at T2 were significantly smaller in the groups of fentanyl 6 μg/kg than 4 μg/kg(P〈0.05).The consumption of propofol and the time T1-3 at T3 were no differences between the groups of fentanyl 4 μg/kg and 6 μg/kg(P〉0.05).The incidence of intubation response was significantly higher in the groups of fentanyl 2 μg/kg than in the orther 3 groups.The incidences of bradycardia and cough,hiccup were significantly higher in the groups of fentanyl 6,8 μg/kg than in 2,4 μg/kg.Conclusion Four doses of fentanyl could enhance the sedation of propofol and reduce the time of anesthesia induction,the synergism of fentanyl 4 μg/kg is more significant and hemodynamics is more stable.
出处 《新疆医科大学学报》 CAS 2010年第3期310-313,共4页 Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
关键词 芬太尼 二异丙酚 靶控输注 血流动力学 fentanyl propofol target-controled infusion hemodynamics
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Iannuzzi E,Iannuzzi M,Cirillo V,et al.Peri-intubation cardiovascular response during low dose remifentanil or sufentanil administration in association with propofol TCI.A double blind comparison[J].Minerva Anestesiol,2004,70:3109-3115. 被引量:1
  • 2Guggenberger H,Schroeder TH,Vonthein R,et al.Remifentanil or sufentanil for coronary surgery comparison of post-operative respiratory impairment[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2006,23(10):832-840. 被引量:1
  • 3Forestier F,Hirschi M,Rouget P,et al.Propofol and sufentanil titration with the bispectral index to provide anesthesia for coronary artery surgery[J].Anesthesiology,2003,99(2):334-346. 被引量:1
  • 4Lentschener C,Ghimouz A,Bonnichon P,et al.Remifentanil-propofol vs sufentanil-propofol:optimal combinations in clinical anesthesia[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2003,47(1):84-99. 被引量:1
  • 5Djian MC,Blanchet B,Pesce F,et al.Comparison of the time to extubation after use of remifentanil or sufentanil in combination with propofol as anesthesia in adults undergoing nonemergency intracranial surgery a prospective randomized doubleblind trial[J].Clin Ther,2006,28(4):560-568. 被引量:1
  • 6郁丽娜,谢俊然,张焰,顾卫东,钱红娣,杨定清.异丙酚靶控输注患者的麻醉深度监测[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(11):877-878. 被引量:12
  • 7Smith C,McEwan AI,Jhaveri R,et al.The interaction of fentanyl on the Cp50 of propofol for loss of consciousness and skin incision[J].Anesthesiology,1994,81:820-828. 被引量:1
  • 8Forrest FC,Tooley MA,Saunders PR,et al.Propofol infusion and the suppression of consciousness:The EEG and dose requirements[J].Br J Anaesth,1994,72:35-41. 被引量:1
  • 9Mertens MJ,Olofsen E,Engbers FH,et al.Propofol reduces perioperative remifentanil requirements in a synergistic manner:response surface modeling of perioperative remifentanil-Propofol interactions[J].Anesthesiology,2003,99:347-359. 被引量:1
  • 10朱敏敏,徐建国,何慧梁,古妙宁,吴琨,张亚军,黄勇,赵诗斌,孟轶男,李丽伶,汪炜健.不同剂量舒芬太尼复合靶控输注异丙酚麻醉诱导对患者血液动力学的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2009,29(4):293-295. 被引量:38

二级参考文献14

  • 1Hans P, Coussaert E, Cantraine F, et al. Effects of target-controlled anesthesia with propofol and sufentanil on the hemodynamic response to Mayfield head holder application. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg, 1998, 49 : 7- 11. 被引量:1
  • 2Lichtenbeh B J, Mertens M, Vuyk J. Strategies to optimise propofol-opioid anaesthesia. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2004, 43:577-593. 被引量:1
  • 3Sanford TJ Jr, Smith NT, Dec-Silver H, et al. A comparison of morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil anesthesia for cardiac surgery: induction, emergence, and extubation. Anesth Analg, 1986, 65:259-266. 被引量:1
  • 4Coda BA. Opioids. In: Barash PG, Clullen BF, Stoelting RK, eds. Clinical anesthesia. 4th edn. Philadelphia PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers, 2001.345-350. 被引量:1
  • 5Miller RD, ed. Miller's anesthesia. 6th edn.曾因明,邓小明,主译.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2006.387-390. 被引量:1
  • 6Shafer A, Doze VA, Shafer SL, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol infusions during general anesthesia. Anesthesiology, 1988, 69:348-356. 被引量:1
  • 7Ng WS. Pathophysiological effects of tracheal intubation. In: Latto IP, Rosen M, eds. Difficulties in tracheal intubation. 1st edn. London: Bailliere Tindall Academic Press, 1985. 12-15. 被引量:1
  • 8Albertin A, Casati A, Deni F, et al. Clinical comparison of either small closes of fentanyl or remifentanil for blunting cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation. Minerva Anesthesiol, 2000, 66: 691- 696. 被引量:1
  • 9Wakeling HG, Zimmerman JB, Howell S, et al. Targeting effect compartment or central compartment concentration of propofol: what predicts loss of consciousness? Anesthesiology, 1999, 90: 92-97. 被引量:1
  • 10Struys MM, De Smet T, Depoorter B, et al. Comparison of plasma compartment vesus two methods for effect compartment-controlled targetcontrolled infusion for propofol. Anesthesiology, 2000, 92: 399-406. 被引量:1

共引文献47

同被引文献21

引证文献5

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部