摘要
目的寻找能较好反映高血压病血压变异、昼夜变化规律等特点的中医分型方法。方法对112例原发性高血压患者按照自拟的八纲辨证标准,及目前常用的高血压病中医分型方法分别进行分型分组,从血压变异、昼夜节律、血压负荷等方面比较几种分型方法特点。结果自拟的八纲标准分型临床证型诊断覆盖率最高,且血压变异及昼夜变化规律在各型间的差异最为显著。新药标准分型方法的血压负荷值变化最为显著。上海标准分型方法,覆盖率最低,分型太细反致各指标变化规律不明显。结论研究调整高血压病血压节律的机理及药物作用时采用八纲标准最佳,研究药物降压作用时可考虑采用新药标准分型。
Objective： To search the best criterion of traditional medical syndrome on hypertension disease to reflect regularity of blood pressure variability. Methods： According to Bagaug criterion made by us and two frequently used criterions, 112 patients with hypertension disease were respectively divided into several teams. By the value of blood pressure variability, circadian rhythm and blood pressure loading. These criterions were compared. Results： Bagang criterion had the highest diagnostic covered ratio and significant difference in blood pressure variability and circadian rhythm. Xinyao criterion had the most different in blood pressure variability. Shanghai criterion had the lowest diagnostic covered ratio and the types were too complex to non constat in blood pressure variability. Conclusion： Bagang criterion is best to study the adjusting blood pressure variability or circadian rhythm.
出处
《中国中医急症》
2010年第3期443-445,共3页
Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
血压变异性
昼夜节律
中医证型
Blood pressure variability
Circadian rhythm
Traditional medical syndrome
