期刊文献+

洛阳地区648例高危新生儿听力障碍筛查结果分析 被引量:3

An analysis of hearing screening results of 648 high-risk neonates with hearing disorder in Luoyang city of Henan province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过新生儿听力筛查并结合易感基因筛查进行结果分析,以了解高危新生儿听力损伤发生情况及主要高危因素。方法采集2007年11月至2008年8月因听力障碍收住院的648例高危新生儿为研究组,同时按1:3比例在同期正常新生儿中随机抽取1 944例作为对照组;采用瞬态诱发耳声发射进行听力筛查,初筛未通过者用进行复筛,复筛未通过者在3个月左右转诊至洛阳市听力筛查诊断中心行听性脑干诱发电位/多频稳态诱发电位/畸变耳声发射/声导抗多种方法组合测试,进行听力学诊断;采用新生儿遗传疾病筛查采样卡采集足跟血,用限制性酶切结合直接测序方法对3种常见耳聋易感基因(m.1555A〉G、GJB2、SLC26A4)突变进行筛查。结果共采集听力障碍高危儿648例,其中男419例,女229例。正常新生儿初筛未通过率2.42%(47/1 944),高危新生儿初筛未通过率18.83%(122/648),两组差异显著(χ2=214.71,P〈0.05)。听力障碍高危儿听力损伤发生率6.17‰(4/648),正常新生儿听力损伤发病率1.03‰(2/1 944),两组差异显著(u=2.34,P〈0.05);高危新生儿基因筛查阳性率为18.52%(12/648),听力障碍确诊率6.17‰(4/648),基因筛查阳性率远高于确诊率。结论听力损伤高危因素主要为早产合并低体重、新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病、高胆红素血症;高危新生儿听力损伤发生率高于正常新生儿;高危新生儿应定期进行听力复查,并及时给予听力学诊断,建立一个详细的追踪随访系统。 Objective To analyze results of neonatal hearing screening combined with results of susceptible genes, so as to investigate prevalence of hearing impairment of highrisk neonates and its main influencing factors. Methods 648 highrisk neonates hospitalized due to hearing disorder over a period from November, 2007 to August, 2008 were selected as hearingimpaired subjects. At the same time, 1 944 normal neonates in the same period according to ratio subject:normal control=1:3 were randomly selected as the controls. The transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) was used to screen the hearing of the neonates. Those neonates who didn’t pass the primary TEOAE screening received rescreening. Then, those neonates who didn’t pass the rescreening were referred to Luoyang Municipal Hearing Screening and Diagnosis Center at age of 3 months for combined testings such as auditory brain stem evoked potentials (ABR)/multifrequency steadystate evoked potential (ASSR)/distortion otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) / acoustic impedance method to diagnoze hearing disorder of the neonate. Meanwhile, the heel blood samples of the neonates with Neonatal Genetic Diseases Screening Sampling Card (utility model patents 200720103139.4) were taken and the restriction enzyme digestion method of direct sequencing was used to screen mutations of 3 common deafness susceptible genes (m.1555A〉 G, GJB2, SLC26A4). Results From November, 2007 to August, 2008, 648 hearingimpaired highrisk nonates (including 419 male neonates and 229 female neonates) were collected. The proportion of newborns who didn’t pass the primary screening in the control group was 2.42% (47/1944), and that in the highrisk neonates group was 18.83% (122/648), there was a significant difference between the two groups (P〈0.05). The incidence of hearing impairment in the highrisk neonates group was 6.17‰(4/648),while that of hearing impairment in the control group was 1.03 ‰ (2 /1 9
出处 《中国妇幼健康研究》 2010年第2期217-219,共3页 Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research
关键词 听力筛查 新生儿 听力障碍 高危因素 hearing screening neonate hearing dosorder risk factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1王德芬,许圣先,刘湘云.小儿听力障碍的早期发现和干预[J].国外医学(儿科学分册),1993,20(3):113-115. 被引量:19
  • 2石丽娥,顾筱琪,钱惠萍.2367例新生儿听力筛查初步报告[J].中国当代儿科杂志,1999,1(5):287-289. 被引量:19
  • 3韩德民.新生儿听力筛查—聋儿的福音[J].中国医学文摘(耳鼻咽喉科学),2007,22(1):1-2. 被引量:41
  • 4卜行宽.国际新生儿听力筛查概况[J].中国医学文摘(耳鼻咽喉科学),2007,22(1):3-4. 被引量:14
  • 5American Academy of pediatrics Newborn and infant nearing loss.Detection and intervention[J].Pediatrics,1991,10(3):527-528. 被引量:1
  • 6Lin HC, Shu MT, Chang KC, et al. A universal newborn hearing screening program in Taiwan[J]. Int J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol, 2002, 63:209. 被引量:1
  • 7Yoshinaga-Itano C, Coulter D, Thomson V. The Colorade newborn hearing screening project: effects on speech and language development for children with hearing loss[J]. J Perinatol, 2000, 20 ( Suppl 8):5132. 被引量:1
  • 8Yoshinaga--Itano C,Sedey AL,Couher DK,et al. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss[J]. Pediatrics, 1998,102 : 1161. 被引量:1
  • 9Yoshinaga--Itano C, Coulter D, Thompson V. Developmental outcomes of children with hearing loss born in hospitals with and without universal newborn hearing screening programs [J]. Semin Neonatol, 2001, 6: 521. 被引量:1
  • 10Norton SJ,Gorga MP, Widen JE, et al. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission and auditory brain stem response test performance[J]. Ear and Hearing, 2000,21:508. 被引量:1

共引文献48

同被引文献16

  • 1韩德民.新生儿听力筛查—聋儿的福音[J].中国医学文摘(耳鼻咽喉科学),2007,22(1):1-2. 被引量:41
  • 2聂文英,戚以胜.高危新生儿的听力监测[J].中国医学文摘(耳鼻咽喉科学),2007,22(1):19-20. 被引量:10
  • 3Mahboubi H, Dwabe S, Fradldn M, et al. Genetics of hearing loss where are we standing now [J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2012, 269 ( 7 ) : 1733-1745. 被引量:1
  • 4Papacharalampous G X, Nikolopoulos T P, Davilis D I, et al. Universal newborn heating screening, a revolutionary diagnosis of deafness : real benefits and limitations [J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2011,268 (10) : 1399-1406. 被引量:1
  • 5Wilcken B. Screening for disease in the newborn: the evidence base for blood-spot screening[J]. Pathology,2012,44 (2) :73-79. 被引量:1
  • 6Fang Y, Gu M, Wang C, et al. GJB2 as Well as SLC26A4 Gene Mutations are Prominent Causes for Congenital Deafness [ J ]. Cell Biochem Biophys,2015, [ Epub ahead of print]. 被引量:1
  • 7Song M H, Shin J W, Park H J, et al. Intrafamilial phenotypic variability in families with biallelic SLC26A4 mutations [J]. Laryngoscope,2014,124(5 ) :E194-E202. 被引量:1
  • 8Olusanya B O, Akinyemi O O. Community-based infant hearing screening in a developing country: parental up take of follow-up serviees F J 1. BMC Publie Health.2009.9:66. 被引量:1
  • 9李红娟,宋亚亮,刘黎明,李芬.语前聋患儿基因突变诊断的研究进展[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2008,19(6):587-588. 被引量:2
  • 10纪育斌,兰兰,王大勇,赵亚丽,王秋菊.中国非综合征型聋患者GJB2基因突变流行病学文献荟萃分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2011,19(4):323-327. 被引量:47

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部