摘要
我国现行共犯制度逻辑使得多元身份主体共同犯罪情况下的定性问题成为我国"共犯与身份"问题的核心难点:无论统一定罪说、分别定罪说还是区别对待说,均无法妥善地实现共犯制度适用的逻辑自洽性、周延性以及与罪刑均衡原则之间的协调性。我国共犯处罚原则设定要求的"确定刑罚以确定共同所犯的罪名为前提"的制度逻辑是形成上述困境的真正原因,改变我国共犯制度逻辑之"主体间性"为应然的"单方化"是解决问题的唯一出路。
The logic of our complicity system make the problem to confirm the accusal when different subjects with different status commit a crime jointly become the major difficulty.Among the uniform view,the respective view and the concretion view,no one can settle for the requirement from logicality doctrine,comprehensiveness doctrine and balance doctrine at the same time.The logic confirming the accusal is the premise to conform the punishment is the real reason to bring out such a difficulty.The only way to solve this question is to change the logic of complicity system from intersubjective to unilateral.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第2期79-87,共9页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级项目<共犯制度的根基与拓展>(05SFB5008)
关键词
共同犯罪
定性难题
罪刑均衡
joint crime
the problem to confirm the nature
logicality doctrine
comprehensiveness doctrine
balance doctrine
