期刊文献+

改良APACHEⅢ预测泌尿外科急诊手术并发症的应用价值 被引量:1

The modified APACHE Ⅲ forecast emergency surgery urological complications value
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估改良APACHEⅢ预测泌尿外科急诊手术并发症的应用价值。方法将我院泌尿外科急诊住院手术患者39例分为并发症组(n=7),无并发症组(n=32),分别用APACHEⅢ、改良A-PACHEⅡ、改良APACHEⅢ进行评分,评分与泌尿外科急诊手术患者术后并发症的相关性进行比较,并分别用24h内的APACHEⅡ、APACHEⅢ、改良APACHEⅢ受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),计算ROC曲线下面积,衡量各种评分系统对患者预后预测判别的能力。并通过ROC曲线加以证实。结果三者评分差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),随着分值的升高,并发症率亦呈现上升趋势。各评分法ROC曲线下面积均大于0.7,从大到小依次为:改良APACHEⅢ(0.878)改良APACHEⅡ(0.805)与APACHEⅢ(0.809)。结论改良APACHEⅢ评分对泌尿外科急诊手术患者的预后评估是可行的,较其他两种评分方法更能反应并发症的发生几率。 Objective To evaluate the modified APACHE In forecast emergency surgery urological complications value. Methods will be hospitalized in our hospital emergency urological surgery is divided into 39 cases of patients with complications group ( n = 7 ), no complication group ( n = 32 ) , respectively, with APACHE Ⅲ, modified APACHE Ⅱ , modified to APACHE m score, score and urological emergency postoperative complications of patients to compare the relevance and use within 24 hours, respectively, the APACHE Ⅱ, A- PACHE Ⅲ modified APACHE Ⅲ receiver operating characteristic curve ( ROC), calculated area under the ROC curve to measure a variety of scoring system for prognosis of patients with the ability to judge. And confirmed through the ROC curve. Results The results of the three score differences were significant ( P 〈 0.05 ) , with the scores of the higher complication rate has also shown an upward trend. The score area under the ROC curve were greater than 0.7, smallest as follows : improvement of APACHE Ⅲ (0. 878) improved APACHE Ⅲ (0. 805 ) and A- PACHE Ⅲ (0. 809). Conclusion The modified APACHE Ⅲ score of urological emergency operation to assess the prognosis of patients is feasible. Score than the other two methods better reflect the risk of complications.
出处 《中国临床实用医学》 2010年第3期50-52,共3页 China Clinical Practical Medicine
关键词 泌外急诊手术 改良APACHE Ⅲ评分 术后并发症 急性生理和慢性健康状态评价 Secretion outside the emergency operation Modified APACHE Ⅲ score Post-operative complications Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献15

  • 1梁建业,周志道,马志民,胡晓宇,高杰.APACHE Ⅱ 评分法在ICU伤员中的应用[J].中华创伤杂志,1994,10(1):39-41. 被引量:8
  • 2周志道.创伤评分[J].中华创伤杂志,1995,11(5):294-295. 被引量:21
  • 3Knaus WA,Wagner DP,Draper EA,et al.The APACHE III prognostic system.Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults [J].Chest,1991;100(6):1619 被引量:1
  • 4Bastos PG,Sun X,Wagner DP,et al.Glasgow Coma Scale score in the evaluation of outcome in the intensive care unit:findings from the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III study [J].Crit Care Med,1993;21(10):1459 被引量:1
  • 5[1]Knaus WK,Draper EA,Wagner DP,et al.APACHE Ⅱ:A.severity of disease classification system.Crit Care Med,1985,13(10):818 被引量:1
  • 6[2]Copeland GP,Jones D,Walters M.POSSUM:a scoring system for surgical audit.Br J Surg,1991,78:356~360 被引量:1
  • 7[4]Baker SP,O'Neill B,Haddon Jr W,et al.The injury Severity score:A method for describing patients With multiple injuries.J Trauma,1974,14:187 被引量:1
  • 8[5]Koehler JJ,et al.Prehospital index:A scoring system for field triage of trauma victims.Amer Emreg Med,1986,15:178 被引量:1
  • 9[6]Clemmer TP,Orme JrJE,Thomas F,et al.Prospective evaluation of the CRAMS scale for triage major trauma.J Trauma,1985,25:188 被引量:1
  • 10[7]Champion HR,Sacco WJ,Copes WS.A review of the trauma score.J Trauma,1989,29:623 被引量:1

共引文献22

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部