摘要
目的:探讨边缘型人格障碍(borderline personality disorder,BPD)大学生的童年期创伤经历特征。方法:用人格诊断问卷第四版(Personality Diagnosis Questionnaire-4+,PDQ-4+)从3227名二、三年级本科生中筛选出边缘型阳性者293例,用个性障碍晤谈手册第四版(Personality Disorder Interview,PDI-IV)半定式晤谈法进一步筛选出BPD患者(得分>5分)31例。从PDQ-4+划界分阴性的大学生中按年龄和性别比随机选取114例为对照组。用童年期创伤经历问卷(Childhood Trauma Questionnaire,CTQ-SF)对两组进行测评。结果:①在PDQ-4+筛查中,总体的边缘型分量表分为(2.62±1.70);31例BPD患者中女18例,男13例,女性CTQ-SF不良环境因子得分高于男性[(13.63±4.54)vs.(9.83±1.95),P<0.01]。②BPD组的CTQ-SF各因子分均高于对照组[如,情感虐待(2.11±0.77)vs.(1.66±0.49),P<0.01]。结论:大学生边缘型人格障碍者均有不同程度的童年期创伤经历,而且这种创伤经历存在性别差异。
Objective： To examine the characteristics of childhood traumatic experiences in borderline person- ality disorder （ BPD） in college students. Methods： The Personality Diagnosis Questionnaire-4 ＋ （ PDQ-4 ＋ ）, Per- sonality Disorder Interview- IV （ PDI - IV ） and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire -28 Short Form （ CTQ-SF ） were administered to 3227 college students of sophomore and junior. Results：（ 1 ） In the investigation of PDQ-4＋ , 31 subjects with childhood traumatic experiences （0. 96% ） were diagnosed as BPD, and the total score of BDL sub- scale was （2. 62± 1.70）, including 18 females and 13 males. In CTQ test, the scores of bad environment in females were significantly higher than that in males [ （ 13. 63 ± 4. 54 ） vs. （9. 83 ± 1.95 ）, P 〈 0. 01 ] . （ 2 ） Sub- jects with BPD got higher scores than normal controls in CTQ-SF, such as the emotional abuse [ 12. 11±0. 77） vs. （ 1.66 ± 0.49 ）, P 〈 0. 01 ] . Conelusion： college students with borderline personality disorder mostly have d different childhood traumatic experiences, and there exists a sex difference.
出处
《中国心理卫生杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第3期228-231,共4页
Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词
边缘型人格障碍
童年期创伤经历
大学生
横断面研究
borderline personality disorder
childhood traumatic experience
college student
cross-sec- tional study
