期刊文献+

经椎管内镇痛行外倒转胎位术的有效性系统评价 被引量:3

Efficacy of Intravertebral Analgesia for External Cephalic Version: A Systematic Review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统评价应用椎管内镇痛行臀先露外倒转胎位术的有效性。方法计算机检索Cochrane Library(2009年第4期)、PubMed(1980~2009)、Ovid MEDLINE(1950~2009)、Ovid循证医学数据库(1991~2009)、EMbase(1980~2009)、CBM(1978~2009)和CNKI(1979~2009),按纳入和排除标准筛选椎管内镇痛在外倒转胎位术中应用的随机对照试验,提取资料及评价文献质量后,采用RevMan5.0.13软件对数据进行Meta分析。结果纳入7个研究,共620例产妇,其中5个研究质量较高,1个较低,1个不清楚。Meta分析结果显示,应用椎管内镇痛后臀先露胎头的外倒转成功率高于对照组,其差异有统计学意义[RR=1.53,95%CI(1.24,1.88)]。结论现有证据显示,椎管内镇痛较静脉给药全身镇痛或无任何镇痛措施,能明显提高臀先露外倒转胎位术的成功率。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of intravertebral analgesia for external cephalic version. Methods We electronically searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), PubMed (1980 to 2009), Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to 2009), Ovid EBM Database (1991 to 2009), EMbase (1980 to 2009), CBM (1978 to 2009) and CNKI (1979 to 2009) to collect literature about intravertebral analgesia for external cephalic version. We screened randomized controlled trials (RCTs) according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and evaluated the quality of the included studies, and then performed meta-analyses by using RevMan 5.0.13 software. Results Seven RCTs involving 620 women met the inclusion criteria. Five trials were of relatively high quality, and 1 of low quality and 2 not clear. The result of meta-analyses showed that intravertebral analgesia was superior in external cephalic version with a RR 1.53 and 95%CI 1.24 to 1.88. Conclusion Intravertebral analgesia can increase the successful rate of external cephalic version in the treatment of breech presentation compared with intravenous medicine for systematic use or no analgesia.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2010年第3期339-345,共7页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
关键词 椎管内镇痛 外倒转胎位术 有效性 系统评价 随机对照试验 Intravertebral analgesia External cephalic version Efficacy Systematic review Randomized controlled tria
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term:a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet, 2000, 356(9239): 1375-1383. 被引量:1
  • 2Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 2. 被引量:1
  • 3Collaris RJ, Oei SG. External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2004, 83(6): 511-518. 被引量:1
  • 4AGOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. AGOG Committee Opinion No.340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery, Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 108(1): 235-237. 被引量:1
  • 5Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of breech presentation. London (UK): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2008. 被引量:1
  • 6刘迈兰,兰蕾,唐勇,梁繁荣.针灸治疗臀先露的系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2009,9(8):840-843. 被引量:2
  • 7Macarthur AJ, Gagnon S, Tureanu LM, et al. Anesthesia facilitation of external cephalic version: A meta-analysis. Am J Obstet and Gynecol, 2004, 191(4): 1219-1224. 被引量:1
  • 8Mancuso KM, Yancey MK, Murphy JA, et al. Epidural analgesia for cephalic version: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 95(5): 648-651. 被引量:1
  • 9Schorr SJ, Speights SE, Ross EL, et al. A randomized trial of epidural anesthesia to improve external cephalic version success. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 177 (5): 1133-1137. 被引量:1
  • 10Dugoff L, Stamm CA, Jones OW, et al. The effect of spinal anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol, 1999, 93 (3): 345-349. 被引量:1

二级参考文献11

共引文献174

同被引文献30

  • 1Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of breec presentation[ M]. Vancouver: Power to Push Campaign, 2006: 18. 被引量:1
  • 2Sultan P, Carvalho B. Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: a systematic review [ J ]. Int J Obst Anesth, 2011, 20 (4) : 299 - 306. 被引量:1
  • 3ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 108(1) : 235 -237. 被引量:1
  • 4Kok M, van der Steeg JW, van der Post JA, et al. Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36 weeks[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2011, 28(2) : 103 - 110. 被引量:1
  • 5Burgos J1, Melchor JC, Pijo6n JI, et al. A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of externalcephalic version for breech presentation at term[ J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2011, 112 (1) : 48 -51. 被引量:1
  • 6Sullivan JT, Grobrnan WA, Bauchat JR, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia on the success of external cephalic version for breech presentation [ J ] Inter J Obstet Anesth, 2009, 18(4) : 328 -334. 被引量:1
  • 7George RT, Singh N, Yentis SM. External cephalic version-the bad, the good and the what now? [J] Int J Obstet Anesth, 2014, 23 (1):4-7. 被引量:1
  • 8Macarthur AJ, Gagnon S, Tureanu LM, et al. Anesthesia facilita- tion of external cephalic version : a meta-analysis [ J ]. Am J Obstet and Gynecol, 2004, 191(4): 1219- 1224. 被引量:1
  • 9Burgos J, Quintana E, Cobos P, et al. Effect of maternal intrave- nous fluid therapy on external cephalic version at term : a prospective cohort study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 211 (6) : 665. el -7. 被引量:1
  • 10Munoz H, Guerra S, Perez-Vaquero P, et al. Remifentanil versus placebo for analgesia during externalcephalic version: a randomised clinical trlal[J]. Int JObstet Anesth, 2014, 23(6): 52 -57. 被引量:1

引证文献3

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部