摘要
经济全球化和经济转轨中的中国正处于企业集团化高峰期。企业集团有可能利用对外合并、内部共谋以妨碍或阻止市场竞争,不同类型的企业集团对竞争的影响大不相同。与单体企业相比,企业集团的反垄断法规制具有主体认定的特殊性,表现为企业集团在反垄断法上的主体地位界定具有复杂性和困难性,这导致我国"婴儿期"的反垄断法对企业集团规制明显存在制度供给不足,有可能对市场的有效竞争形成损害。我国亟待构建完备的对企业集团进行反垄断规制的制度体系,核心是企业集团在反垄断法上的主体地位甄别与认定;主体地位的界定应当借鉴美欧成熟的理论,对企业集团的限制竞争行为展开准确有效的规制。
In the economic globalization and economic transition, China is experiencing a peak of enterprise groups. Enterprise groups may make use of external merges or internal conspiracies to handicap or prevent market competition. Different types of enterprise groups have different impacts on competition. Compared with monomer enterprises, anti-monopoly regulations of enterprise groups have their specificity on subject identification, which is expressed by the complexity and difficulty of the definition of subject position of enterprise groups. It results in the inadequate institutional supply of anti-monopoly regulations of enterprise groups and may damage the effective market competition. China should be urgent to construct a comprehensive institutional system about anti-monopoly regulations of enterprise groups. The core is to define the subject position of enterprise groups in anti-monopoly law. We should learn from the mature theories of Europe and America on the definition of subject position so as to regulate the restriction of competition made by enterprise groups effectively and accurately.
出处
《上海财经大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第1期35-42,共8页
Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
关键词
企业集团
法律主体
限制竞争
集团共谋理论
企业实体理论
enterprise group
legal subject
restriction of competition
group conspiracy theory
enterprise entity theory
