期刊文献+

70例小儿食道异物取出术的麻醉处理体会 被引量:1

70例小儿食道异物取出术的麻醉处理体会
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对比丙泊酚联合舒芬太尼与单纯丙泊酚应用于小儿食道异物取出术的麻醉效果,探讨丙泊酚联合舒芬太尼麻醉方案的优势。方法将从2009年2月~2009年6月入住我院接受手术的70例食道异物患儿随机平均分为实验组和对照组。两组均行表面麻醉,实验组行丙泊酚联合舒芬太尼麻醉,对照组行单纯丙泊酚麻醉。观察对比两组患儿MAP、HR、SpO2,用药剂量,不良反应,意识消失,恢复以及定向力恢复时间。结果实验组MAP、HR显著低于对照组(P<0.05),意识消失,恢复时间,定向力恢复时间,以及用药剂量和不良反应也显著少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论丙泊酚联合舒芬太尼用药剂量小,不良反应少,麻醉效果强,是一种值得在临床上推广和应用的麻醉方案。 Objective Through comparing the anaesthetic effect of the combination propofol with sufentanil and the simple propofol applied in the operation of removal of esophagus foreign body, to discuss the advantage of the combination anesthesia scheme. Methods 70 cases of children with operation of removal of esophagus foreign body in hospital for treatment from February 2009 to June 2009 were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group on average. Both groups were treated with surface anaesthetic at first, then the experimental group was applied with combination anesthesia scheme, and the control group was applied with simple anesthesia scheme. HR, SpO2, MAP, dosage, adverse reactions, the consciousness vanished and recovered time, the directional forces recovered time in two groups were compared and observed. Results All of the index observed in two groups except SpO2 showed significant differences (P〈0.05), the competitive clinical effect of experimental group was significantly higher than control group (P〈0.05).Conclusion the combination anesthesia scheme needs lesser sufentanil dose-dependence, and shows smaller adverse effects and stronger anaesthetic effect, so it is a anesthesia scheme deserved popularizing and applying in clinical work.
作者 陈沛华
出处 《当代医学》 2010年第9期48-49,共2页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 食道异物取出术 丙泊酚 舒芬太尼 Operation of removal of esophagus foreign body Propofol Sufentanil
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献3

  • 1[1]Hsien YC, Hwang SM,Kuo TBJ, et al. Effects of propofbl on nociceptive response and power spectra of electroencephalographic and systemic arterial pressure signals in the rat: Correction with plasma concentration. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 1995 ;275(3): 1568 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Mccolum JSC, Dundee JW. Comparison of the induction characteristics of four intravenous anaesthetic agents. Anaesthesia, 1986;41:995 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Heath PJ,Kennedy DJ, Ogg TW, et al. Which intravenous induction agent for day surgery ? Anaesthesia, 1998;43:365 被引量:1

共引文献5

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部