摘要
目的通过对比硼酸酒精和派瑞松乳膏治疗真菌性外耳道炎的临床效果,探讨派瑞松疗法的优势。方法将88例真菌性外耳道炎患者随机平均分为治疗组和对照组。对照组施用4%硼酸酒精疗法,实验组施用派瑞松疗法。治疗结束后对两组临床效果进行对比和分析。结果实验组痊愈38例,总有效率97.7%,对照组痊愈25例,总有效率81.8%。实验组疗效显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论派瑞松乳膏具有良好的抗菌消炎作用,疗效显著,安全性高,值得在临床上推广和应用。
Objective Through the contrast of boric acid alcohol and pevisone cream in the treatment of fungal otitis externa, to explore the clinical advantage of pevisone cream therapy. Methods 88 cases of patients with fungal otitis externa were randomly divided into the treatment group and the control group on average. Control group were treated with 4% boric acid alcohol, and treatment group were treated with pevisone cream therapy. After the treatment the clinical effect of two groups were compared and analyzed. Results 38 patients of treatment group recovered and the total effective rate reached up 97.7%; 25 patients of control group recovered and the total effective rate was 81.8%. Curative effect of treatment group is significantly better than control group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Pevisone cream has good antibacterial and antiphlogistic effect, and also showed significant curative effect and high security, so it is deserved application and popularization in clinical work.
出处
《当代医学》
2010年第9期3-4,共2页
Contemporary Medicine
关键词
真菌性外耳道炎
硼酸酒精
派瑞松乳膏
疗效对比
Fungal otitis externa
Boric acid alcohol
Pevisone cream
Curative effect contrast
