期刊文献+

欧美人文社会科学评价的现状与反思 被引量:27

原文传递
导出
摘要 相比自然科学,人文社会科学评价具有复杂性、模糊性等难点。目前国外的人文社会科学研究成果评价,广泛采用的方法是同行评议,但也有许多国家辅以引文分析等文献计量方法,实现了定性评价与定量评价的有机结合。从美国、英国、法国、加拿大、德国等欧美主要国家人文社会科学研究评价现状可以看出,学术评价方法,尤其是定量指标如何使用,与管理层的目的密不可分,适合的评价方法才是最好的评价方法。研究国外人文社会科学研究评价现状,对促进我国科学的评价机制的建立具有重要的现实意义。
出处 《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期111-118,共8页 Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(04&ZD031)
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1朱少强.国内外人文社会科学研究评价综述[J].评价与管理,2007,5(4):39-63. 被引量:17
  • 2Mu-hsuan Huang and Yu-wei Chang," Characteristics of Research Output in Social Sciences and Humanities: from a Research Evaluation Perspective," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 ( 11 ), 2008, pp. 1818 - 1828. 被引量:1
  • 3Zuckennan H. and Merton R. K. ,"Age, Aging and Age Structure in Science,"in Merton R. K. (ed.), The Sociology of Science, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1973, pp. 493 - 560. 被引量:1
  • 4Henk F. Moed," Research Assessment in Social Sciences and Humanities,"http ://www2. lingue. unibo. it/evaluationinthehumanities/Research% 20Assessment% 20in% 20Social% 20Sciences% 20and% 20Humanities. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 5Henk F. Moed,'" Research Assessment in Social Sciences and Humanities," http ://www2. lingue. unibo. it/evaluationinthehumanities/Research% 20 Assessment% 20in% 20Social% 20Sciences% 20and% 20Humanities. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 6Geoffrey Crossick," Journals in the Arts and Humanities: their Role in Evaluation," Journals in the Arts and Humanities, 20 (3) ,2007, pp. 184 - 187. 被引量:1
  • 7B. C. Pestana, I. Gomez, M. T. Fernandez, M. A. Zulueta and A. Mendez," Scientometric Evaluation of R&D Activities in Medium-size Institution : a Case Study Based on the Spanish Scientific Research Council," in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 1995, pp. 425 - 434. 被引量:1
  • 8Clyve Jones, Michael Chapman and Pamela Carr Woods, "The Characteristics of the Literature Used by Historians," Journal of Librarianship and Information, 4(3 ), 1972, pp. 137 - 156. 被引量:1
  • 9Mu-hsuan Huang and Yu-wei Chang," Characteristics of Research Output in Social Sciences and Humanities: from a Research Evaluation Perspective," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 ( 11 ),2008 , pp. 1818 - 1828. 被引量:1
  • 10Anthony F J van Rann, "Assessment of Social Science : the Use of Advanced Bibliometric Methods as a Necessary Complement of Peer Review," Research Evaluation, 7 ( 1 ), 1998, pp. 2 - 6. 被引量:1

二级参考文献75

共引文献49

同被引文献262

引证文献27

二级引证文献239

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部