期刊文献+

新辅助化疗治疗三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后对比分析 被引量:7

Evaluation and Comparative prognostic analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on triple negative breast cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:通过新辅助化疗提高三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)手术切除的近期和远期疗效并比较两种不同方案新辅助化疗的治疗效果。方法:128例局部晚期TNBC患者分为两组,A组采取ET(吡柔比星联合多西他赛)方案,B组采取GP(顺铂联合吉西他滨)方案进行新辅助化疗,观察化疗后病理反应及其与远期生存的关系。结果:ET组有效率为88.7%,GP组为82.0%。两组5年总生存率和5年无病生存率(DFS)分别为75.4%、71.4%和85.3%、58.9%。结论:TNBC对紫杉联合蒽环类(ET组)较顺铂联合吉西他滨的(GP组)新辅助化疗更敏感,更易获cCR、pCR。 OBJECTIVE: To comparing the efficacy of two different protocal of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on triple negative breast cancer(TNBC). METHODS: A total of 128 cases of locally advanced breast cancer patients were divided into A and B groups, and all with pathologically diagnosis of TNBC by immunohistoehemis'try. A was given pirarubicin combining Docetaxel(ET), and B was given cisplatin combining Gecitabine(GP). After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathological reaction and long term follow up were observed. RESULTS: The efficiency of the ET group was 88.7%, and GP group was 82.0%. The 5 year survival rate and disease-free survival (DFS) of Group A were 75.4%, and 85.3% ; Group B is 71.4% and 58.9%, respectively There was significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The results show that anthracycline combining taxane (ET group) have more sensitive than cisplatin combining gemcitabine (GP group) to TNBC for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, more accessible cCR, pCR.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 2009年第23期1872-1874,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 乳腺肿瘤/药物疗法 药物疗法 联合 预后 breast neoplasms/drug therapy drug therapy, combination prgnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1孙燕 周际昌.临床肿瘤内科手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.45. 被引量:30
  • 2徐兵河.乳腺癌内分泌治疗的现状与展望[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2006,13(3):161-164. 被引量:12
  • 3Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Gr oup (EBC-TCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hor monal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials[J]. Lancet, 2005, 365(9472) : 1687-1717. 被引量:1
  • 4Keam B, Im S A, Kim H J, et al. Prognostic impact of clinicopat hologic parameters in stage Ⅱ/ Ⅲ breast cancer treated wit hneoadjuvant docetaxel and doxorubicin ehemot herapyt paradoxical features of the triple negative breast cancer[J]. BMC Cancer, 2007, 7(2) :203-214. 被引量:1
  • 5Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess K R, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long term survival in patients with triple negative breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(8): 1275-1281. 被引量:1
  • 6Rouzier R, Pusztai L, Garbay J R, et al. Development and validation of nomograms for predicting residual tumor size and the probability of success ful conservative surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer[J]. Cancer, 2006, 107 (7): 1459-1466. 被引量:1
  • 7Sirohi B, Arnedos M, Popat S, et al. Platinum based chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer[J]. Ann Oncol, 2008,19 (11) : 1847-1852. 被引量:1

共引文献40

同被引文献76

  • 1任统伟,王润莲,张敏,袁航,王春燕.NE方案新辅助化疗治疗局部晚期乳腺癌的临床疗效分析[J].实用癌症杂志,2005,20(6):646-647. 被引量:12
  • 2杨梅,汤致强.3种化疗方案治疗乳腺癌的成本-效果分析[J].中国药学杂志,2007,42(16):1272-1274. 被引量:2
  • 3Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE, et al. Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyelophosphamide for operable breast cancer: national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocol B-27[J]. J Clin On- col,2006,24(13) :2019-2027. 被引量:1
  • 4Lv M,Li B,Li Y,et al. Predictive role of molecular subtypes in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients in Northeast China[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey, 2011,12 (9): 2411-2417. 被引量:1
  • 5Tanei T,Shimomura A,Shimazu K,et al. Prognostic significance of Ki67 index after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer [J]. Eur J SurgOncol,2011,37(2):155-161. 被引量:1
  • 6Lips EH, Mulder L, de Ronde J J, et al. Neoadjuvant chemothera- py in ER+ HER2- breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2012,131(3) :827-836. 被引量:1
  • 7Kim SI,Sohn J,Koo J S,et al. Molecular subtypes and tumor re- sponse to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally ad- vanced breast cancerFJT. Oneology,2010,79(5-6) : 324-330. 被引量:1
  • 8Therasse P,Arbuck SG,Eisenhauer EA,et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92(3) :205-216. 被引量:1
  • 9Ogston KN,Miller ID,Payne S,et al. A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemo- therapy:prognostic significance and survival[J]. Breast,2003,12 (5) : 320-327. 被引量:1
  • 10Cheang MC,Chia SK,Voduc D, et al. Ki-67 index, HER2 sta- tus,and prognosis ofpatients with luminal B breast cancer[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2009,101(10) : 736-750. 被引量:1

引证文献7

二级引证文献131

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部