期刊文献+

供应链中基于货架空间分配的质量改进策略研究 被引量:14

Strategies of quality improvement in supply chains based on shelf space allocation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 考虑一个包含两个竞争的制造商和一个共同的零售商的供应链模型,制造商提供的产品是紧密可替代的,最终消费者对每个产品的需求与市场中产品的质量差异和该产品的货架空间相关.文中分析指出零售商的最优货架空间分配策略是使货架空间的比值等于产品在零售商总收益中的比值.文中研究供应链中的三种情况.在无质量改进的情况中,文中分析产品的货架空间和市场需求与产品的潜在需求、边际收益和货架空间弹性系数的关系.在单方质量改进的情况中,分析指出产品的最优质量改进水平和货架空间随着产品的潜在需求优势增大而提高.在同时质量改进的竞争均衡中,主要结论指出,当市场需求对质量差异的反应或者货架空间弹性系数越大,质量竞争的激烈程度提高,且制造商将采用更高质量水平;零售商和有质量改进成本优势的制造商将从质量竞争受益;质量成本劣势的制造商和整个供应链在质量竞争中受损;消费者将从质量竞争中获益. This paper considers a supply chain with two competing manufacturers and a common retailer. The products provided by the two manufacturers are highly substitutable. The market demand of each product is based on the difference degrees of product quality and the shelf space of each product. The analysis shows that the retailer' s optimal strategy of shelf space allocation is that the ratio of product' s respective shelf space is equal to the ratio of the respective product' s revenues relative to total revenues. We consider three scenarios in the supply chain. In the scenario of non-quality-improvement, we investigate relations of shelf spaces and market demands to intrinsic demands, margin profits and the elasticity of shelf space. In the scenario of one-side quality-improvement, we show that, as product' s intrinsic demand increases, the optimal levels of quality im provement and shelf spaces increase. In the scenario of simultaneous quality-improvement, the main results indicate that, as the responsiveness of market demand to the difference of quality levels or the elasticity of shelf space increases, the intensity of quality competition increases and manufacturers adopt a higher quality level. The retailer and the manufacturer with cost advantageous of quality-improvement will benefit from the quality- improvement competition, while the manufacturer with cost disadvantageous of quality-improvement and the whole supply chain will lose. The consumer will benefit from quality competition.
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期31-39,共9页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70432001) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20070410166) 上海市重点学科建设资助项目(B210)
关键词 市场竞争 顾客价值 供应链 协调 价格竞争 shelf-space allocation Nash equilibrium coordination jointly decision retail competition
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Banker R D, Khosla I K, Sinha K. Quality and competition[J]. Management Science, 1995, 44(9) : 1179 -1192. 被引量:1
  • 2Amrouche N, Zaccour G. Shelf-space allocation of national and private brands [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 180(2) : 648 -663. 被引量:1
  • 3Wang Y-Z, Gerchak Y. Supply chain coordination when demand is shelf-space dependent[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2001, 3 ( 1 ) : 82 - 87. 被引量:1
  • 4Desmet P, Renaudin V. Estimation of product category sales responsiveness to allocated shelf space [ J ]. Inter. J. of Research in Marketing, 1998, 15:443-457. 被引量:1
  • 5Moorthy S K. Product and price competition in a duopoly[ J]. Marketing Science, 1988, 7:141 -168. 被引量:1
  • 6Chambers C, Kouvelis P, Semple J. Quality-based competition, profitability, and variable cost[ J ]. Management Science, 2006, 52(12) : 1884 - 1895. 被引量:1
  • 7Bookbinder J H, Zarour F H. Direct product profitability and retail shelf-space allocation models [ J ]. Journal of Business Logistics, 2001,22(2) : 183 -208. 被引量:1
  • 8Martin-Herren G, Taboubi S, Zaccour G. The impact of manufacturers' wholesale prices on a retailer' s shelf-space and pricing decisions[J]. Decision Sciences, 2006, 37(1): 71-90. 被引量:1
  • 9Bernstein F, Federguren A. A general equilibrium model for industries with price and service competition [ J ]. Operations Research, 2004, 52(6) : 868 -886. 被引量:1
  • 10Tsay A A, Agrawal N. Channel dynamics under price and service competition [ J]. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 2000, 2(4): 372-391. 被引量:1

二级参考文献15

  • 1余素红,张世英,宋军.基于GARCH模型和SV模型的VaR比较[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(5):61-66. 被引量:76
  • 2Iyer G.Coordinating channels under price and nonprice competition[J].Marketing Science,1998,17(4):338-355. 被引量:1
  • 3Moorthy K S.Product and price competition in a duopoly[J].Marketing Science,1988,7(2):141-168. 被引量:1
  • 4Tsay A,Aggrawal N.Channel dynamics under price and service competition[J].Manufacturing & Service Operations Management,2000,2(4):372-391. 被引量:1
  • 5Desiraju R,Moorthy S.Managing a distribution channel under asymmetric information with performation with performance requirements[J].Management Science,1997,43(12):1628-1644. 被引量:1
  • 6Choi S C.Price competition in a channel structure with a common retailer[J].Marketing Science,1991,10(4):271-296. 被引量:1
  • 7Jeuland A,Shugan S.Managing channel profits[J].Marketing Science,1983,2(3):239-272. 被引量:1
  • 8Scthi S,Yan H,Zhang H.Inventory and Supply Chain Management with Forecast Updates[M].New York:Springer-Verlag,2005.165-221. 被引量:1
  • 9McGuire T,Staelin R.An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration[J].Marketing Science,1983,2(2):161-192. 被引量:1
  • 10Lee E,Staelin R.Vertical strategic interaction:Implications for channel pricing strategy[J].Marketing Science,1997,16(3):185-207. 被引量:1

共引文献90

同被引文献202

引证文献14

二级引证文献119

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部