期刊文献+

全身炎症反应综合征APACHEⅡ评分的应用价值 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨APACHEⅡ评分在预测全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)严重程度和预后中的作用,提高对SIRS的认识。方法采用APACHEⅡ评分系统对231例SIRS患者进行评分分析。结果SIRS患者APAC脏Ⅱ评分为8~40(15.60±8.97)分,其中符合SIRS标准4项者分值高于3项者,3项者高于2项者,出现多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)患者高于非MODS患者,死亡组高于存活组(P均〈0.01)。随着分值增高,SIRS患者的预测死亡风险率和实际病死率呈逐渐上升趋势(P〈0.01),且后两者之间呈正相关关系(r=0.36,P〈0.01)。结论APACHEⅡ评分系统对评估SIRS患者病情程度及预后具有参考价值。
出处 《现代中西医结合杂志》 CAS 2010年第4期440-441,共2页 Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献20

  • 1王今达,王宝恩.多脏器功能失常综合征(MODS)病情分期诊断及严重程度评分标准(经庐山’95全国危重病急救医学学术会讨论通过)[J].中国危重病急救医学,1995,7(6):346-347. 被引量:1423
  • 2王今达.90年代多脏衰综合征:SIRS与MODS[J].中国危重病急救医学,1995,7(6):324-328. 被引量:69
  • 3Marshall J C,Cook D J,Christou N V,et al.Multiple organ dysfunction score:a reli able descriptor of a complex clinical outcome[J].Crit Care Med,1995,23:1638-1652. 被引量:1
  • 4Bone R C,Balk R A,Cerra F B,et al.Defi nitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative th erapies in sepsis[J].Chest,1992,101(6):1644-1655. 被引量:1
  • 5Vincent J L,Moreno R,Takala J,et al.The SOFA(sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure[J] .Intensive Care Med,1996,22:707-710. 被引量:1
  • 6Hallonen K I,Pettila V,Leppaniem A K,et al.Multiple organ dysfunction ass ociated with acute pancreatitis[J].Crit Care Med,2002,30:1274-127 9 被引量:1
  • 7Pettila V,Pettila M,Sarna S,et al.Comparison of multiple organ dysfunctio n scores in the prediction of hospital mortality in the critically ill[J].Cri t Care Med,2002,30(8):1705-1711. 被引量:1
  • 8Angus D C,Linde-Zwirble W T,Lidicker J,et al.Epidemiology of s evere sepsis in the United States:analysis of incidence,outcome,and associat ed costs care[J].Crit Care Med,2001,29(7):1303-1310. 被引量:1
  • 9Weycker D,Akhras K S,Edelsberg J,et al.Long-term mortality and medical care charges in patients with severe sepsis[J].Crit Care Med,2003,31 (9):2316-2323. 被引量:1
  • 10Fry D E,Pearlstein L,Fulton R L,et al.Multiple system organ failure,the role of uncontrolled infection[J].Arch Surg,1980,115(2):136-140. 被引量:1

共引文献402

同被引文献26

  • 1王小兵,夏业军,潘怀富,丁淑如.APACHEII评分对219例重症急性肾衰竭病情程度及预后分析[J].疑难病杂志,2005,4(1):13-15. 被引量:2
  • 2刘清泉.对脓毒症中医病机特点及治法的认识[J].北京中医,2007,26(4):198-200. 被引量:210
  • 3杨宗成,王甲汉.烧伤治疗学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:205-206. 被引量:4
  • 4Paul M,Shani V,Muchtar E,et al.Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efi cacy of appropriate empiric antibiotictherapy for sepsis[J].Antimierob Agents Chemother,2010,54(11):4851-4863. 被引量:1
  • 5Takeda,Akira S.Toll-like receptors in innate immunity[J].Int Immunol,2005,17(1):1-14. 被引量:1
  • 6Payen D,Marco J,Cavaillon JM,et al.Impact of continuous venovenous hemofilration On organ failure during the early phase of severe sepsis,A randomized controlled trial[J].Critical Care Medicine,2009,37(6):803-810. 被引量:1
  • 7Gogos CA,Drosou E,Bassaris HP,et al.Pro-versus anti-inflammatory cytokine profile in patients with severe sepsis:a marker for prognosis and future therapeutic options[J].J Infec D,2000,181(1):176-180. 被引量:1
  • 8Knaus W A, Zimmerman J E, Wagner D P, et al. A- PACHE acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system [ J ]. Crit Care Med, 1981,9 (8) : 591 - 597. 被引量:1
  • 9Knaus W A, Wagner D P, Draper E A, et al. The A- PACHE Ⅲ prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults [ J ]. Chest, 1991,100(6) :1 619- 1 636. 被引量:1
  • 10Moore E C, Pilcher D V, Bailey M J, et al. A simple tool for mortality prediction in burns patients: APACHE Ⅲ scoreandFTSA[ J]. Burns,2010,36(7 ) : 1086 - 1 091. 被引量:1

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部