摘要
诚信原则作为各国民法中最重要的原则,已经成为国际法中的一般法律原则,越来越频繁地应用在WTO争端解决中。由于诚信原则存在明显的不确定性,难以在实践中适用,专家组和上诉机构在诸多案例中对诚信原则的含义及其解释法律和弥补法律漏洞的司法职能进行了确认,并成功地解决了不少争端。遗憾的是,上诉机构的司法限制制约了专家组的有益探索,过分谨慎。当前国际国内经济与法律的发展为专家组和上诉机构进行更大胆的探索准备了良好的条件,WTO争端解决机制应充分发挥诚信原则的司法职能,确立成员方诚信履行WTO实体法律的独立的义务,这将有利于弥补WTO的相关法律漏洞,迅速有效地解决争端。
Good faith, one of the most important principles in civil law all over the world, has become a general principle in international law, and is applied more frequently in the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Because of uncertainty and difficulty in following the principle in practice, the WTO Panels and the Appellate Body had to make decisions successfully as to its implications, and interpretative and judicial functions （e. g. , to fill loopholes of WTO laws） in many cases. Unfortunately, judicial restriction on the Appellate Body seems to have hindered the efforts of the Panels and results in over-cautions. Present economic and legal developments have laid a solid foundation for Panels and the Appellate Body, thus the WTO dispute settlement system should fully exercise the judicial function of the principle, and determine that each member is separately liable to comply with the substantive rules of WTO in good faith, which conduces to filling the loopholes of the WTO laws and settling disputes promptly and effectively.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第1期108-119,共12页
Modern Law Science
关键词
诚信原则
合法期望
举证责任
一般法律原则
principle of good faith
legitimate expectation
burden of proof
general principle of law
