期刊文献+

颈椎前路椎体融合与人工间盘置换术后相邻节段蜕变的前瞻性研究 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对颈椎前路椎体融合与人工间盘置换术后相邻节段蜕变情况及其治疗效果进行比较。方法选择2004年3月—2007年10月收治的单节段退行性颈椎间盘突出患者62例,用随机数字表将其随机分为两组。A组33例,行颈椎前路减压植骨融合术;B组29例,前路椎间盘切除后行Bryan人工间盘假体置换术。两组患者术前及术后均进行颈椎X线检查,应用KellgrenX线颈椎蜕变分级来判定是否出现相邻节段新增蜕变或蜕变加重;应用Odem标准进行术后疗效评价。结果术后随访时间为12~24个月,平均18个月。术后新出现和加重的相邻节段蜕变患者A组为14例,B组为4例,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.14,P<0.05);伴有症状的蜕变患者A组为9例,B组为1例,两组间差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.84,P<0.05)。Odem疗效评价结果,A组优良率为84.8%(28/33),B组为86.2%(25/29),两组间差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.10,P>0.05)。结论人工间盘置换术能有效减少相邻节段间盘蜕变,延缓或预防相邻节段蜕变疾病症状的发生。
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期311-312,共2页 Chinese General Practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Boden SD, Balderston RA, Heller JG, et al An AOA critical issue. Disc replacements this time will we really cure low - back and neck pain [J]. Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004, 86:411-422. 被引量:1
  • 2Goffin Long - of the Teeh, J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. term follow - up after interbody fusion cervical spine [J]. Spinal Disord 2004, 17: 79-85. 被引量:1
  • 3Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis [J]. Bone Joint Surg Am, 1999, 81: 519-528. 被引量:1
  • 4邱贵兴,徐宏光,翁习生.脊柱固定融合术后邻近节段病[J].中国医学科学院学报,2005,27(2):249-253. 被引量:21
  • 5Teramoto T, Ohmofi K, Takatsu T, et al. Long - term results of the anterior cervical spondylodesis [J]. Neurosurgery, 1994, 35 : 64 - 68. 被引量:1

二级参考文献37

  • 1Maiman DJ, Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, et al. Biomechanical effect of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments. Biomed Mater Eng, 1999, 9(1):27-38. 被引量:1
  • 2Chow DH, Luk KD, Evans JH, et al. Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segments. Spine, 1996, 21(5):549-555. 被引量:1
  • 3Kaiser MG, Haid RW, Subach BR, et al. Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft. Neurosurgery, 2002, 50(2):229-236. 被引量:1
  • 4Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2004, 86(7): 1497-1503. 被引量:1
  • 5Ijumi Y, Kumano K. Analysis of sagittal lumbar alignment and after posterior instrumentation. Risk factor for adjacent unfused segment. Eur J Ortho Trauma Surg Traumatol, 2001,11(1):9-13. 被引量:1
  • 6Korovessis P, Papazisis Z, Koureas G, et al. Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results. Spine, 2004, 29(7):735-742. 被引量:1
  • 7Schulitz KP, Wiesner L, Wittenberg RH, et al. The mobile segment above fusion. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 1996, 134(2):171-176. 被引量:1
  • 8Lehmann TR, Spratt KF, Tozzi JE, et al. Long-term followup of lower lumbar fusion patients. Spine, 1987, 12(2):97-104. 被引量:1
  • 9Leong JC, Chun SY, Grange WJ, et al. Long-term results of lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse. Spine, 1983, 8(7):793 -799. 被引量:1
  • 10Hambly MF, Wiltse LL, Raghavan N, et al. The transition zone above a lumbosacral fusion. Spine, 1998, 23(16):1785-1792. 被引量:1

共引文献20

同被引文献7

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部