摘要
AIM： To compare the diagnostic capability of multidetector computed tomography （MDCT） and magnetic resonance imaging （MRI） for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma （HCC） tumour nodules and their effect on patient management. METHODS： A total of 28 patients （25 male, 3 female, mean age 67 ± 10.8 years） with biopsy-proven HCC were investigated with 64-row MDCT （slice 3 mm native, arterial and portal-venous phase, 120 mL Iomeprol, 4 mL/s, delay by bolus trigger） and MRI （Tlfs fl2d TE/ TR 2.72/129 ms, T2tse TE/TR 102/4000 ms, 5-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced Tlfs fl3d TE/TR 1.56/4.6, Gadolinium-DTPA, slice 4 mm）. Consensus reading of both modalities was used as reference. Tumour nodules were analyzed with respect to number, size, and location. RESULTS： In total, 162 tumour nodules were detected by consensus reading. MRI detected significantly more tumour nodules （159 vs 123, P 〈 0.001） compared to MDCT, with the best sensitivity for early arterial phase MRI. False-negative CT findings included nodules ≤ 5 mm （n = 5）, ≤ 10 mm （n = 17）, ≤ 15 mm （n= 12）,≤20mm（n=4）,andlnodule〉20mm.MRI missed 2 nodules ≤ 10 mm and 1 nodule ≤ 15 mm. On MRI, nodule diameters were greater than on CT （29.2 ≤25.1 mm, range 5-140 mm vs 24.1 ± 22.7 mm, range 4-129 mm, P 〈 0.005）. In 2 patients, MDCT showed only unilobar tumour spread, whereas MRI revealed additional nodules in the contralateral lobe. Detection of these nodules could have changed the therapeutic strategy. CONCLUSION： Contrast-enhanced MRI is superior to 64-row MDCT for the detection of HCC nodules. Patients should be allocated to interventional or operative treatment according to a dedicated MRI-protocol.
AIM:To compare the diagnostic capability of multidetector computed tomography(MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) tumour nodules and their effect on patient management.METHODS:A total of 28 patients(25 male,3 female,mean age 67±10.8 years) with biopsy-proven HCC were investigated with 64-row MDCT(slice 3 mm native,arterial and portal-venous phase,120 mL Iomeprol,4 mL/s,delay by bolus trigger) and MRI(T1fs fl2d TE/ TR 2.72/129 ms,T2tse TE/TR 102/4000 ms,5-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced T1fs fl3d TE/TR 1.56/4.6,Gadolinium-DTPA,slice 4 mm).Consensus reading of both modalities was used as reference.Tumour nodules were analyzed with respect to number,size,and location.RESULTS:In total,162 tumour nodules were detected by consensus reading.MRI detected signifi cantly more tumour nodules(159 vs 123,P<0.001) compared to MDCT,with the best sensitivity for early arterial phase MRI.False-negative CT findings included nodules ≤5 mm(n=5),≤10 mm(n=17),≤15 mm(n=12),≤20 mm(n=4),and 1 nodule >20 mm.MRI missed 2 nodules ≤10 mm and 1 nodule ≤15 mm.On MRI,nodule diameters were greater than on CT(29.2±25.1 mm,range 5-140 mm vs 24.1±22.7 mm,range 4-129 mm,P<0.005).In 2 patients,MDCT showed only unilobar tumour spread,whereas MRI revealed additional nodules in the contralateral lobe.Detection of these nodules could have changed the therapeutic strategy.CONCLUSION:Contrast-enhanced MRI is superior to 64-row MDCT for the detection of HCC nodules.Patients should be allocated to interventional or operative treatment according to a dedicated MRI-protocol.
