期刊文献+

基于顾客需求满足度的产品总体设计方案评价 被引量:9

Evaluation of Product Outline Design Scheme Based on Customer Requirements Satisfaction Degree
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统方案评价中指标及其权重或偏好的确定具有不一致性和不确定性特点,提出了一种以顾客需求满足度为依据的方案评价方法.利用由顾客需求向工程特性映射的质量屋信息,按照构建质量屋的反方向将工程特性满足度转化为顾客需求满足度.为了有效处理模糊和不确定的工程特性评价信息,采用粗糙集理论将评价数据表达为粗糙数形式,进而计算工程特性满足度.考虑到工程特性满足度之间的补偿关系,采用非准确性计算方法,利用顾客需求与工程特性的修正相关关系计算顾客需求满足度,最后计算总体顾客需求满足度,并将其作为方案排序的依据.以水平定向钻完整产品总体设计方案的评价为例,验证了所提出方法的有效性. To deal with the problem that determination of evaluation indices and their weights or prefer- ences is inconsistent and uncertain in traditional scheme evaluation, a scheme evaluation method was proposed based on the satisfaction degree of customer requirements. Using the mapping information in house of quality (HoQ) from customer requirements (CRs) to engineering characteristics (ECs), the satisfaction degree of each EC was transformed into the satisfaction degree of each CR in the opposite direction of constructing HoQ. To deal with imprecise and fuzzy evaluating information of ECs, evaluation data were expressed as rough numbers by means of rough set theory, and then the satisfaction degree of each EC was calculated. Considering the compensation relationship of satisfaction degree among each EC, method of imprecision (MoI) was used to calculate the satisfaction degree of each CR based on the modified relationships between CRs and ECs. Finally, the overall satisfaction degree of CRs was calculated as reference of scheme ranking. A case study of horizontal directional drilling outline design scheme evaluation was pres- ented to illustrate effectiveness of the proposed method.
出处 《上海交通大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第12期1923-1929,共7页 Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划(863)项目(2007AA04Z140) 教育部高等学校博士点基金资助项目(20070248020) 上海市重点学科建设资助项目(Y0102)
关键词 方案评价 质量屋 顾客需求 粗糙数 非准确性计算方法 scheme evaluation house of quality customer requirement rough number method of impre-cision
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Mullur A A, Mattson C A,Messac A. Pitfalls of the typical construction of decision matrices for concept selection[C]//Proeeedings of the 41st Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit. Reno:AIAA,2003. 被引量:1
  • 2Ayag Z. An integrated approach to evaluating conceptual design alternatives in a new product development environment[J].International Journal of Production Research,2005,43(4) : 687-713. 被引量:1
  • 3Chen H H, Lee A H,Tong Y H. Prioritization and operations NPD mix in a network with strategic partners under uncertainty[J]. Expert Systems with Ap- plications, 2007, 33(2): 337-346. 被引量:1
  • 4Kahraman C, Buyukozkan G, Ates N Y. A two phase multi-attribute decision making approach for new product introduction [J].Information Sciences, 2007, 177:1567-1582. 被引量:1
  • 5Buyukozkan G, Feyzioglu O. A fuzzy-logic-based decision-making approach for new product development[J].Int J Production Economics, 2004, 90(1) :27-45. 被引量:1
  • 6黄洪钟,田志刚,关立文.基于神经网络的交互式物理规划及在机械设计中的应用研究[J].机械工程学报,2002,38(4):51-57. 被引量:13
  • 7Chan L K, Wu M L. A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example [J]. Omega, 2005, 33(1) :119-139. 被引量:1
  • 8Mikhailov L. Deriving priorities from fuzzy pair wise comparison judgments [J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003(134) :365-385. 被引量:1
  • 9Pawlak Z. A rough set view on rayes' theorem[-J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2003, 18 (5) :487-498. 被引量:1
  • 10Zhai L Y, Zhong L P,Zhong Z W. A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2007,37(5) : 613-624. 被引量:1

二级参考文献2

共引文献12

同被引文献92

引证文献9

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部