期刊文献+

欧洲住房金融改革对中国的借鉴意义 被引量:1

Housing Finance Reform in Europe:Relevance for China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自从1960与1970年代以来,更多的欧洲国家放松了它们的住宅政策。我们注意到从公共融资向私人融资的转变、从社会住宅向商业住宅的转变、从住房建设补贴向住房人头补贴的转变、从管制租金向市值租金的转变、以及从租赁房向自有房的转变。大部分这些转变都可以统称为"私有化"以及"自由化"这些定义不明的词语。然而,欧盟大部分国家的住宅金融体系仍然复杂而不合理,需要更多的住宅金融改革。我们将详述一种住宅金融改革的核心内容,包括如下几点:住房建设补贴、租户的住房人头补贴、自有房的税收优惠、房屋租赁政策、以及住宅联盟的角色。通过这种分析,我们勾画出欧盟国家住宅金融深入改革的轮廓。在不久的将来,中国也会考虑相似的住宅金融改革。 Since the 1960s and the 1970s, an increasing number of European countries have liberated their housing policy. We observe shifts from public to private finance, from social housing to commercial housing, from property subsidies to housing allowances, from regulated rents to market rents, and from renting to home-ownership. Most of these developments are bundled together under the unclear definitions of ' privatisation' and ' liberalisation' . Nevertheless, most housing finance systems in the European Union are still complicated and irrational. There is scope for more housing finance reforms in this part of the world. We will elaborate the following core issues for such a housing finance reform: property subsidies, housing allowances for tenants, tax benefits for owner- occupiers, rent policy and the role of housing associations. With this analysis we sketch the contours of a further reform of housing finance in EU countries. It will not last very long before a similar housing finance reform will also be considered in China.
出处 《国际城市规划》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期72-81,88,共11页 Urban Planning International
关键词 住宅金融 住宅补贴 税收优惠 住宅联盟 房屋租赁政策 城市重构 欧盟 Housing Finance Housing Allowances Tax Benefits Housing Association Rent Policy Urban Restructuring European Union
  • 相关文献

参考文献57

  • 1Aaron, H.J., 1972, Shelter and Subsidies; Who benefits from Federal Housing Policies? Washington DC. 被引量:1
  • 2Boelhouwer, P., 1999, International Comparison of Social Housing Management in Western Europe, Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 14: 225-240. 被引量:1
  • 3Boelhouwer, P.J., M.E.A. Haffner, P. Neuteboom and P. de Vries, 2001, Koopprijsontwikkeling en de fiscale behandeling van het eigen huis [House price development and the fiscal treatment of the owner-occupier], Delft (OTB, TU Delft). 被引量:1
  • 4Boelhouwer, P. and H. van der Heijden, 1992, Housing Systems in Europe. Part I. A comparative study of housing policy, Delft (Delft University Press). 被引量:1
  • 5Bundesministerium for Verkehr, Bauund Wohnungswesen (2001) Hinweise zur Erstellung von Mietspiegeln [Tips on compiling rent databases], Brochure. 被引量:1
  • 6Conijn, J.B.S., 1995, Enkele financieel-economische grondslagen van de volkshuisvesting [Some financial-economic basics of housing], Delft (Delftse Universitaire Pers). 被引量:1
  • 7Conijn, J.B.S., 2005, Woningcorporaties: naar een duidelijke taakaibakening en een heldere sturing [Housing associations: towards clear tasks and clear management], Amsterdam (RIGO Research en Advies). 被引量:1
  • 8Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML), 1998, Housing Subsidies and Tax Relief in Britain, London (CML). 被引量:1
  • 9De Kam, C.A. and H. Priemus, 1979, De fiscale behandeling van de bewoner-eigenaar opnieuw bezien, Ⅰ + Ⅱ [The fiscal treatment of the owner-occupier: a new view], ESB, 11 July: 680-686 and 18 July: 704-712. 被引量:1
  • 10Dieleman, F., 1999, The Impact of Housing Policy Changes on Housing Associations: experiences in the Netherlands, Housing Studies, 14: 251- 259. 被引量:1

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部