期刊文献+

基于控制约束的安全性验证方法 被引量:1

A Safety Verification Method Based on Control Constraints
下载PDF
导出
摘要 事件树、故障树等传统基于事件的验证方法难以考虑工程系统研发和运用过程中复杂交互作用对安全性的影响。依据社会-技术系统控制模型建立层次化安全控制结构,运用安全控制约束考查系统各层次组件间交互作用中可能存在的控制缺陷,实现对系统满足安全要求的验证,给出了一个对设计方案进行验证的应用示例。 It is difficult to take into account that safety problems caused by complex interactions between system components during the development and operation of engineering systems by the conventional event-based verification methods such as event tree, fault tree etc. According to the model of socio-technical control, a hierarchical safety control structure is firstly presented. Then, by means of safety control constraints, the control flaws which may exist in the complex interactions between system components on different levels of the hierarchical structure can be identified. As a result of that, whether the safety requirements have been fufilled can been verified. Finally, an example of verifying a design scheme safety is shown in detail by the proposed method.
出处 《导弹与航天运载技术》 北大核心 2009年第6期55-59,共5页 Missiles and Space Vehicles
基金 装备预言基金项目(9140A19030306KG)
关键词 安全性验证 控制约束 安全控制结构 Safety verification Control constraint Safety control structure.
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Perrow C. Normal accidents: living with high-risk technology[M]. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1984. 被引量:1
  • 2Leveson N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems[J]. Safety Science, 2004, 42(4): 237-270. 被引量:1
  • 3Kohda T, Takagi Y. Accident cause analysis of complex systems based on safety control functions[M]. Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2006:570-576. 被引量:1
  • 4Rasmussen J, Svedung I. Proactive risk management in a dynamic society[M]. Swedish Rescue Services Agency, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 5Kletz T A. Human problems with computer control[J]. Plant/Operations Progress, 1982, 1(4): 209-211. 被引量:1

同被引文献16

  • 1龚时雨,谭跃进.工程系统一体化安全风险模型研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(2):149-154. 被引量:6
  • 2Leveson N G. A new accident model for engineering safer sys- tems[J]. Safety Science, 2004, 42(4) : 237 - 270. 被引量:1
  • 3Leveson N G. Applying systems thinking to analyze and learn fromevents[J].Safety Science, 2011, 49(1): 55-64. 被引量:1
  • 4Bakolas E, Saleh J H. Augmenting defense-in-depth with the concepts of observability and diagnosability from control theory and discrete events systems[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2011, 96(1) : 184 - 193. 被引量:1
  • 5Qureshi Z H. A review of accident modeling approaches for com- plex critical socioteehnical systems [R]. Edinburgh= De fence Science and Technology Organisation , 2008. 被引量:1
  • 6Saleh J H, Marais K B, Bakolas E, et al. Highlights from the literature on accident causation and system safety: review of ma- jor ideas, recent contributions, and challenges[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2010, 95(11) : 1105 - 1116. 被引量:1
  • 7Kurtoglu T, Tumer I Y, Jensen D C. A functional failure rea- soning methodology for evaluation of conceptual system architec- tures[J]. Research on Engineering Design, 2010, 21(4):209 - 234. 被引量:1
  • 8Kurtoglu T, Tumer I Y. A graph-based fault identification and prop- agation framework for functional design of complex systems[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 2008, 130(5): 1-8. 被引量:1
  • 9Ghemraoui R, Mathieu L, Tricot N. Design method for system-atic safety integration[J]. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Tech- nology, 2009, 58(1):161-164. 被引量:1
  • 10Sklet S. Safety barriers: definition, classification and perform- ance[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, 19(4): 494-506. 被引量:1

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部