期刊文献+

农业科学领域国际合作的中印比较 被引量:3

Comparison of the International Scientific Collaboration between China and India in Agriculture Science
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过整理SCI数据库中中国和印度农业科学方面的国际合著论文,从国际合著论文数量、国际合著论文篇均合著国家数、国际合著论文篇均被引频次、国际合著网及国际合著论文的学科分布,比较了两国农业科学领域的国际合作。结果是,中国农业科学领域的国际合著论文自2000年开始超过印度,且差距越来越大;中国国际合著论文的篇均被引频次高于印度;中国更注重加强已有的国际合著关系,印度更注重建立新的国际合著关系;中国农业科学领域国际合作的重点学科依次是食品科技、农艺学、土壤学,印度依次是农艺学、食品科技、多学科农学。 Adopting Chinese and India's international co-authored articles in agriculture science covered by Science Citation Index-Expanded during 1982-2006, we compare the international agriculture collaboration between China and India viewed from the number of international co-authored articles, times cited per international co-authored article, international co-authorship network, subject distribution of international co-authored articles. The results show that China surpass India in term of international co-authored articles since 2000; Chinese times cited per international co-authored article is higher than India; China emphasizes the existing international co-authorship, while India pay more attention to new international co-authorship; Food Science and Technology, Agronomy, Soil Science are the main subjects in international agriculture collaboration in China, while Agronomy, Food Science and Technology, Agriculture, Multidisciplinary are the major subjects in international agriculture collaboration in India.
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第12期25-29,共5页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"强竞争与弱竞争态势下科技发展与科技评价的科学计量学研究"(70673019)
关键词 农业科学 国际合著论文 中印比较 被引频次 合著网络 学科分布 agriculture science international co-authorship comparison between China and India times cited co-authorship network subject distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1刘云,常青.中国基础研究国际合作的科学计量测度与评价[J].管理科学学报,2001,4(1):64-74. 被引量:35
  • 2Basu, A., Aggarwal, R. International collaboration in science in India and its impact on institutional performance[J].Scientometrics, 2001, 52 (3): 379-394. 被引量:1
  • 3Okubo, Y., Miquel, J.F. International scientific collaboration of Japan co-authorship analysis[J]. Journal of Science Policy and Research Management, 1992, 6(4): 1-16. 被引量:1
  • 4Leta, J., Chaimovich, H. Recognition and international collaboration: the Brazilian case[J]. Scientometrics, 2002, 53(3): 325-335. 被引量:1
  • 5《中国科技发展研究报告》研究组.中国科技发展研究报告(2000)--科技全球化及中国面临的挑战[R].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:227. 被引量:1
  • 6Gupta, B.M., Dhawan, S.M. Measures of progress of science in India: An analysis of the publication output in science and technology[R]. New Delhi: National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies(NISTADS),2006:29-30. 被引量:1
  • 7唐品.《科学引文索引》及其在科研评价中的作用[J].图书与情报,2005(1):68-70. 被引量:32
  • 8Arunachalam, S., Gunasekaran, S. Tuberculosis research in India and China: From bibliometrics to research policy[J]. Current Science, 2002, 82(8): 933-947. 被引量:1
  • 9Amnachalam, S., Gunasekaran, S. Diabetes research in India and China today: From literature-based mapping to healthcare policy[J]. Current Science,2002,82(9):1086-1097. 被引量:1
  • 10Harsanyi, M.A. Multiple authors, multiple problems bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: A literature review[J]. Library & Information Science Research, 1993, 15(4):325-354. 被引量:1

二级参考文献11

共引文献67

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部