期刊文献+

基于模糊综合评判的M&S可信性评估研究 被引量:3

Research on M&S credibility evaluation based on FSE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为保证M&S可信性评估工作有效和成功地完成,构建了由影响因素、校核与验证(verification and vali-dation,V&V)过程和可信性特性组成三维可信性信息空间,并以此为理论基础,以V&V过程模型为基本框架,综合分析可信性在V&V过程中不同阶段的评价标准,建立了M&S可信性评估模型;在分析了模糊综合评估模型的基础上,以某飞行视景仿真系统的设计与开发为例,进行可信性评估。应用实例表明,所建立的评估模型及采用的评估方法合理有效。 Aiming at executing the M&S credibility evaluation efficiently, established cost-effectively and successfully, established the three-dimensional credibility information space consisting of influencing factors, V&V process, and credibility characteristics. According to the theory of the three-dimensional credibility information space, based on the V&V process, combined with the detailed discussion of credibility characteristics, the M&S credibility evaluation model was set up, which was the foundation of credibility evaluation. Based on fuzzy math theory, applied a fuzzy synthesis evaluation (FSE) method to the credibility evaluation of a certain flight visual simulation system. The result of which shows the reasonability and validity of the proposed approach.
出处 《计算机应用研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第12期4509-4512,共4页 Application Research of Computers
基金 陕西省自然科学基金资助项目(2007F40)
关键词 可信性评估模型 三维可信性信息空间 校核与验证 可信性特性 模糊综合评判 credibility evaluation model three-dimensional credibility information space verification and validation(V&amp V) credibility characteristics fuzzy synthesis evaluation(FSE)
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1吴晓燕,许素红,刘兴堂,王学智.现代军用仿真系统的新特点及技术对策[J].空军工程大学学报(自然科学版),2002,3(6):29-32. 被引量:8
  • 2TAN Ya-xin, WANG Jing-ye, ZHANG Wei. Discussion on credibility theory of simulation application [ C ]//Proc of the 7th International Conference on System Simulation and Scientific Computing. Beijing: IEEE Press ,2008:445- 451. 被引量:1
  • 3BRADE D. A generalized process for the verification nd validation of models and simulation results[D]. Munchen: University Der Bundeswehr, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 4张冰..分布交互仿真系统评估技术研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学,2001:
  • 5DMSO. Department of defense verification, validation and accreditation (VV&A) recommended practices guide [ R ]. Alexandria, VA: Defense Modeling and Simulation Office, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 6LIU Fei, YANG Ming, WANG Zi-cai. Study on simulation credibility metrics[ C]//Proc of Winter Simulation Conference. Orlando, FL: IEEE Press, 2005:2554- 2560. 被引量:1
  • 7国家技术监督局.GB/T16260-1996,信息技术软件产品评价质量特性及其使用指南[S].1992. 被引量:1
  • 8BALCI O, ORMSBY W F, CARR J T, et al. Planning for verification, validation, and accreditation of modeling and simulation applications[ C]//Proc of Winter Simulation Conference. Orlando, FL: IEEE Press, 2000 : 829- 839. 被引量:1
  • 9郭铜修,刘鲁,杨思峰.企业生产作业系统模糊评价模型分析应用研究[J].系统工程与电子技术,2008,30(12):2412-2416. 被引量:3
  • 10张伟,王行仁.仿真可信度模糊评判[J].系统仿真学报,2001,13(4):473-475. 被引量:41

二级参考文献18

共引文献48

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部