摘要
本文利用"框架借用"的概念,对处于同一集体抗争"主框架"下的失地农民与知识精英两个不同性质群体的集体抗争进行了比较研究,指出失地农民通过借用知识精英的话语及策略以建构自己的运动框架,形成草根型框架借用;同时,知识精英也利用失地农民叙事框架的"弱势"特征,形成精英型框架借用,而二者之间的非对称性,很可能导致精英将草根的利益诉求进行"失真处理",使草根的部分利益诉求被"置换"。
This paper uses the concept of frame borrowing to compare the collective counteracts of the landless peasants and the intellectual elite,the two qualitatively different groups in the same 'primary' collective-counteract framework. The former have borrowed the latter's discourse and strategies to construct their movement framework,described as 'the grassroots’ frame borrowing';whereas the latter have borrowed the former's narrative frame and its characteristics of the weaker group,described as 'the elite's frame borrowing.' However,due to the asymmetry between these two types of frame borrowing,it is very likely for the elite to jeopardize the presentation of the grassroots’ interest,which may be partially displaced.
出处
《社会》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第6期107-126,共20页
Chinese Journal of Sociology
关键词
框架借用
草根型框架借用
精英型框架借用
失地农民
知识精英
置换
displacement,the elite's frame borrowing,frame borrowing,the grassroots’ frame borrowing,the intellectual elite,landless peasants
