摘要
美国针对商品流通领域的反价格垄断的专门立法主要有《罗宾森—帕特曼法》和《米勒—泰丁法》。《罗宾森—帕特曼法》将价格歧视明确化,《米勒—泰丁法》将转售价格控制合法化。我国的《反垄断法》已有针对商品流通领域反价格垄断问题的基本规定,这些条款在实践中,仍然具有进一步明确和解释的空间。我国的反垄断立法在很大程度上借鉴了美国的立法。
From a comparative law perspective, this article discusses the historic background and main contents of the U. S.＇s soecuakuzed anti-monopoly legislation on commodity distrbution pricing. It focuses on the Robinson-Patman Act which made clear of discriminatory pricing and the Miller-Tydings Act which legitimatised the resale price maintenance. China＇s Anti-monopoly Law has basic rules concerning anti-monopoly on pricing monopoly in commodity distribtion. These clauses have more room to be clarified and interpreted in practice. China＇s anti-monopoly legislation has learned a lot from that of the U. S. Analysis of the cause and effect of U. S. ＇s anti-monopoly law on commodity distribution will help us to understand the provisions of China Anti-monopoly Law, and to promote its implementation.
出处
《盐城师范学院学报（人文社会科学版）》
2009年第5期30-34,共5页
Journal of Yancheng Teachers University（Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
反垄断
商品流通
价格歧视
转售价格控制
Anti-monopoly
commodity distribution
discriminatory pricing
resale price maintenance
