期刊文献+

汉语中名词的可数性 被引量:1

The Countability of Nouns in Chinese
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在评述Chierchia(1998)和Cheng&Sybesma(1999)的理论的基础上,批判地继承了后者的观点,认为汉语中名词存在可数与不可数的区分,不过这一区分是通过分类词的选用反映出来的。文章进一步讨论了可数分类词与不可数分类词的区别及划分标准,并尝试对可数分类词下定义,借此把汉语中的可数名词与不可数名词区分开来。 On the basis of the literature review of Chierchia (1998) and Cheng & Sybesma (1999), this paper critically adopts the viewpoint of the latter, claiming that there is a distinction between count nouns and mass nouns in Chinese, which is reflected at the classifier level. The paper further discusses the differences between countclassifiers and mass classifiers as well as the criteria to distinguish them, and tries to give a definition to count classifiers, by which, the count nouns are set apart from the mass nouns in Chinese.
作者 陈中毅
出处 《阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第5期26-32,共7页 Journal of Fuyang Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金 阜阳师范学院人文社会科学研究青年项目"英汉名词短语结构研究"(编号:2008WQ16)
关键词 汉语 可数名词 不可数名词 分类词 Mandarin Chinese count nouns mass nouns classifiers
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Chierchia, Gennaro. Reference to Kinds Across Languages[J]. Natural Language Semantics, 1998, (6) : 339 - 405. 被引量:1
  • 2Krifka, Manfred. Common Nouns : A Contrastive Analysis of Chinese and English [ A ]. In G. Carlson and J. Pelletier ( eds. ) , The Generic Book [ C ]. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995. 398 -411. 被引量:1
  • 3Cheng, L. and R. Sybesma. Bare and Not - So - Bare Nouns and the Structure of NP [ J ]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1999, 30 : 509 - 542. 被引量:1
  • 4Kim, J. Plurality in Classifier Languages [ D ].UMI. University of California, Irvine, 2005. 被引量:1
  • 5Doetjes, Jenny. Mass and Count : Syntax or Semanties ? [ A 1. In Proceedings of Meaning on the HIL [ C ]. ( HIL Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1. ) HIL/Leiden University, 1996. 34-52. 被引量:1
  • 6Doejes, Jenny. Quantifiers and Selection : On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English [ D]. Leiden University, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 7Gillon, Brenda, Eva Kehayia, and Vanessa Taler.The Mass/Count Distinction : Evidence from On - Line Psycholinguistic Performance [ J ]. Brain and Language, 1999, 68 : 205 - 211. 被引量:1
  • 8Muromatsu, Keiko. On the Syntax of Classifiers [D]. UMI. University of Maryland, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 9Greenberg, Joseph H. Numeral Classifiers and Sub-stantial Number: Problems in the Genesis of a Linguistic Type [A]. In A. Makkai, V. Makkai and L. Heilmann (eds.), Linguistics at the Crossroads [ C ]. Padova, Italy: Liviana Editrice, 1977. 276 - 300. 被引量:1
  • 10Adams, Karen L. and Nancy Faires Conklin. Toward a Theory of Natural Classification [A]. CLS 9 [C], 1973. 1 -10. 被引量:1

同被引文献4

  • 1[苏]康斯坦丁诺夫.马克思主义哲学原理[M].北京:人民出版社,1985. 被引量:1
  • 2[苏]M.甘希娜.英语语法[M].北京:时代出版社,1958. 被引量:1
  • 3王寅.认知语言学[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2003. 被引量:1
  • 4[丹麦]奥托·叶斯柏森.语法哲学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2009. 被引量:1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部