期刊文献+

文拉法辛与阿米替林预防偏头痛的对照研究 被引量:5

Comparative study of venlafaxine and amitriptyline in the prophylaxis of migraine.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的以阿米替林为对照,评价盐酸文拉法辛胶囊预防偏头痛的疗效及安全性。方法79例偏头痛患者随机分成盐酸文拉法辛组(n=40)和阿米替林组(n=39),盐酸文拉法辛组服用盐酸文拉法辛胶囊75 mg/d,阿米替林组服用阿米替林75mg/d,疗程均为3月。治疗前、治疗1个月、2个月和3个月后分别评价患者的头痛发作次数、严重程度和头痛持续时间,以及治疗后1个月、2个月和3个月的不良反应发生情况。结果经盐酸文拉法辛和阿米替林治疗1月、2月及3月后,患者的头痛发作次数、严重程度及持续时间均显著改善,差异有统计学意义;同时治疗2个月疗效好于1个月,治疗3个月疗效好于2个月;两组患者治疗前后各时点头痛发作次数、严重程度、持续时间比较无统计学差异。但阿米替林不良反应发生率显著高于盐酸文拉法辛,分别是77.8%和21%,差异有统计学意义。结论盐酸文拉法辛预防偏头痛疗效确切,安全性好。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine(VLF) in the prophylaxis of migraine com- pared with amitriptyline(AMT). Methods Seventy nine patients with migraine were randomly assigned to VLF 75mg group( n = 40) and AMT group( n = 39). The frequency of headache attacks, the severity and duration of attacks were monitored before treatment and every one month after treatment for 3 months. Adverse events were also evaluated during these visits. Results Significant differences were observed between before treatment and every one month after treat- ment in the number of headache attacks, the severity and duration of attacks (P 〈 0.05, or P 〈0.01 ) in both groups. Significant differences were also observed between 2nd month and 1st month( P 〈0.05, or P 〈0.01 ) , 3th month and 2nd month(P 〈0.05, or P 〈0.01 ) after treatment in the 3 parameters in both groups. There were no significant differ- ences between two groups in the 3 parameters at each visit. The prevalence of adverse events was significantly higher in AMT group(77.8% ) than that in VLF group(21% ) ( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Venlafaxine is effective and safe for prophylaxis of migraine.
作者 黄雨兰 喻良
出处 《精神医学杂志》 2009年第5期341-343,共3页 Journal of Psychiatry
关键词 文拉法辛 阿米替林 偏头痛 Venlafaxine Amitriptyline Migraine
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Diener HCh. Pharmacological approaches to migraine [ J ]. J Neural Transm Suppl, 2003, 64 : 35 - 63. 被引量:1
  • 2Silberstein SD, Goadsby PJ. Migraine: preventive treatment [J]. Cephalalgia,2002, 22:491 - 512. 被引量:1
  • 3Bendtsen L, Jensen R, Olesen J. A non - selective ( amitriptyline), but not a selective (citalopram), serotonin reuptake inhibitor is effective in the prophylactic treatment of chronic tension- type headache [ J ]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1996, 61:285 290. 被引量:1
  • 4Adelman LC, Adelman JU, Von Seggem R, et al. Venlafaxine extended release (XR) for the prophylaxis of migraine and tension - type headache : a retrospective study in a clinical setting [J]. Headache,2000, 40:572 580. 被引量:1
  • 5Bulut S, Berilgen MS, Baran A, et al. Venlafaxine versus amitriptyline in the prophylactic treatment of migraine: randomized, double - blind, crossover study [ J ]. Clin Neurol Ncurosurg, 2004, 107:44-48. 被引量:1
  • 6Ozyalcin SN, Talu GK, Kizihan E, et al. The efficacy and safety of venlafaxine in the prophylaxis of migraine[J]. Headache, 2005, 45 : 13,4 - 152. 被引量:1
  • 7周红雨,周东,常履华,王学锋.盐酸文拉法辛治疗慢性紧张性头痛的安全性观察[J].华西药学杂志,2006,21(3):307-309. 被引量:5
  • 8Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias, and facial pain[ M]. Second Edition. Cephallalgia, 2004, 24( Suppll ) :1. 被引量:1
  • 9Stefan Evers. Treatment of migraine with prophylactic drugs [ J ]. Expert Opin. Pharmacother, 2008,9 ( 15 ) :2565 - 2573. 被引量:1
  • 10Krymchantowski AV, Silva MT, Barbosa JS, et al. Amitriptyline versus amitriptyline combined with fluoxetine in the preventative treatment of transformed migraine: a double - blind study[J]. Headache , 2002, 42:510 514. 被引量:1

二级参考文献7

共引文献4

同被引文献71

引证文献5

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部