摘要
目的比较常规法与停顿法水合氯醛保留灌肠的效果。方法选择60例需辅助检查的患儿,按入院先后分为常规灌肠法(对照组)、停顿灌肠法(观察组),每组30例,比较两组患儿的灌肠效果。结果两组患儿起效及维持时间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论停顿式灌肠法实用性强,操作简便,效果优于常规法灌肠。
Objective To compare the routine method with the time-delayed method of retention enema with chloral hydrate and observe the effects. Methods Sixty patients with assistant examinations were equally divided into the control group treated with the routine method of retention emema and the observational group treated with the time-delayed method of retention enema with chloral hydrate. Then the effects after the treatment were compared. Results The differences of the onset time and sustained time between the two groups Were significant（P〈0. 01）. Conclusion The time-delayed method of retention enema of chloral hydrate is more practical, convenient and effective than the routine method.
出处
《解放军护理杂志》
2009年第20期13-14,共2页
Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
关键词
保留灌肠
水合氯醛
临床比较
retention enema
chloral hydrate
clinical comparison
