期刊文献+

企业制度反应策略模式研究:中国经验 被引量:5

The Research on Firm's Institutional Response Strategy——Evidence from China
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文对转型时期我国企业的制度反应策略模式及其资源基础与绩效表现进行了实证研究。结果表明:(1)在我国的转型制度背景下,企业的制度反应策略可分为基于合作动机的遵守行为、参与行为、关联行为、游说行为与代言行为,以及基于对抗动机的挑战行为、质疑行为与影响行为;(2)企业制度反应策略与资源具有显著的相关性,其中,制度资源对于企业所采取的合作性制度反应策略具有更强的解释力,而市场资源与企业抵制或挑战现存规则的制度反应行为相关性更显著;(3)企业制度反应策略与绩效也具有显著的关联性,而且基于合作动机的制度反应行为可以使企业获得更显著的绩效,尤其是制度绩效。 The paper made an empirical research upon firms' institutional response strategies anti its resource bases and performance influence. The results indicate: (1) In Chinese transition, firms' institutional response behaviors could be classified 2 big types, one of which are motivated by cooperation, including conforming action, participating action, associated action, lobbying action, prolocutor action; other one is motivated by resistance, consisting of challenging action, doubting action, and influence action; (2) Firm' s institution response action is related with resources significantly in total. And institutional resources is more associated with firm's cooperated institutional actions; marketing resources is more related to the challenging institutional behaviors; (3) Firm's institution response action is associated to performance significantly, and those institution response action with cooperation motivation would bring more significant performance, especially institutional performance.
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第10期67-74,共8页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"基于消费者伦理意识的制度导向营销行为及其消费者响应研究"(70902053) 国家自然科学基金项目"企业市场战略与非市场战略的整合模式研究"(70472058)
关键词 制度理论 制度反应行为 企业资源 企业绩效 我国企业 institutional theory institution response action firm resource firm performance Chinese firm
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Carpenter, M. A. The Implications of Strategy and Social Context for the Relationship between Top Management Team Heterogeneity and Firm Performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002, (3). 被引量:1
  • 2Chen,C. J. , Z. LI, and X. Su. Rent Seeking Incentives, Political Connections and Organizational:Empirical Evidence trom listed tamily firms in China [C]. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2005. 被引量:1
  • 3Child, J. and Tse, D.K. China's Transition and Its Implications for International Business[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2001, 32,(1). 被引量:1
  • 4Child, J. and T. Tsai, The Dynamic Between Firms' Environmental Strategies and Institutional Constraints in Emerging Economies: Evidence from China and Taiwan[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2005, 42, (1) . 被引量:1
  • 5Dacin, M. T. , Goodstein, J. and Scott, W.R. Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: Introduction to the Special Research Forum[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45, (1). 被引量:1
  • 6Dahan, N. A Contribution to the Conceptualization of Political Resources Utilized in Corporate Political Action[J]. Journal of Public Affairs, 2005, (5). 被引量:1
  • 7Deephourse,D. L. ,&Carter,S. M. An Examination of Differences between Organizational Legitimacy and Organizational Reputation [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2005,42, (2). 被引量:1
  • 8Fan,Y. Questioning Guanxi: Definition, Classification and Implications[J].International Business Review, 2002, 11, (5). 被引量:1
  • 9Hafsi, T. and Tian, Z. The Chinese Electricity Industry from 1980 to 2002: Towards a Theory of Large Scale Institutional Change[J]. Long Range Planning, 2005,38, (6). 被引量:1
  • 10John, A.& Shawn, C. The Role of Effective Resource Utilization on Strategy's Impact on Performance[J].International Journal of Commerce & Management, 2001, (116). 被引量:1

二级参考文献119

共引文献185

同被引文献89

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部